TY - JOUR
T1 - Downsizing and productivity growth
T2 - Myth or reality?
AU - Baily, Martin Neil
AU - Bartelsman, Eric J.
AU - Haltiwanger, John
PY - 1996
Y1 - 1996
N2 - The conventional wisdom is that the rising productivity in the U.S. manufacturing sector in the 1980s has been driven by the apparently pervasive downsizing over this period. Aggregate evidence clearly shows falling employment accompanying the rise in productivity. In this paper, we examine the microeconomic evidence using the plant level data from the Longitudinal Research Database (LRD). In contrast to the conventional wisdom, we find that plants that increased employment as well as productivity contribute almost as much to overall productivity growth in the 1980s as the plants that increased productivity at the expense of employment. Further, there are striking differences by sector (defined by industry, size, region, wages, and ownership type) in the allocation of plants in terms of whether they upsize or downsize and whether they increase or decrease productivity. Nevertheless, in spite of the striking differences across sectors defined in a variety of ways, most of the variance of productivity and employment growth is accounted for by idiosyncratic factors.
AB - The conventional wisdom is that the rising productivity in the U.S. manufacturing sector in the 1980s has been driven by the apparently pervasive downsizing over this period. Aggregate evidence clearly shows falling employment accompanying the rise in productivity. In this paper, we examine the microeconomic evidence using the plant level data from the Longitudinal Research Database (LRD). In contrast to the conventional wisdom, we find that plants that increased employment as well as productivity contribute almost as much to overall productivity growth in the 1980s as the plants that increased productivity at the expense of employment. Further, there are striking differences by sector (defined by industry, size, region, wages, and ownership type) in the allocation of plants in terms of whether they upsize or downsize and whether they increase or decrease productivity. Nevertheless, in spite of the striking differences across sectors defined in a variety of ways, most of the variance of productivity and employment growth is accounted for by idiosyncratic factors.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21344474517&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21344474517&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/BF00393276
DO - 10.1007/BF00393276
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:21344474517
SN - 0921-898X
VL - 8
SP - 259
EP - 278
JO - Small Business Economics
JF - Small Business Economics
IS - 4
ER -