Doxastic doubt, fiducial doubt, and Christian faith. A response to Gunter Zimmermann

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review


In this paper I respond to Gunter Zimmermann's article on doubt and faith in God that was published in this journal last year, by offering some criticisms of his views and elaborating on certain issues that Zimmermann leaves nearly or entirely untouched. First, I argue that Zimmermann's analysis of doxastic doubt is incomplete. Next, I defend the thesis that whether some specific doxastic doubt is compatible with someone's faith depends in at least four regards on the person who has that doubt. Subsequently, I champion the view that some so-called fiducial doubts are compatible with faith in God, whereas certain others are not. Also, I explain why by its very nature having some fiducial doubt entails having some doxastic doubt. Finally, I deal with some biblical passages in order to show why they do not preclude the possibility of someone's having faith and at the same time having certain fiducial doubts. © Walter de Gruyter 2007.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)183-198
Number of pages16
JournalNeue Zeitschrift fur Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2007


Dive into the research topics of 'Doxastic doubt, fiducial doubt, and Christian faith. A response to Gunter Zimmermann'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this