Dramatising Siamese independence: Thai postcolonial perspectives on kingship

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In Thailand, an exalted veneration for the monarchy generates a continuous production of royalist and nationalistically inclined popular culture. One strand within this royalist nationalism evolves around the patriotic quality of ‘being Thai’ or ‘Thainess’, a combination of being united as a people in love with the monarchy while remaining proud of the nation’s everlasting independence. This narrative emphasises the bravery and wisdom of the old Siamese kings in fighting their arch-enemy, the Burmese, and their successes in maintaining the kingdom’s independence throughout its entire existence, including the period of Western high imperialism and aggression towards Siam. This particular historiography originated during the reign of King Chulalongkorn (r. 1865–1910), which paradoxically involved a grand scheme of internal colonisation by the absolute monarchy. Although scholarly work has thoroughly deconstructed the royalist account of the Siamese experiences with colonialism, this post-colonial perspective still exerts a strong impact on the cultural politics of the late twentieth and early twenty-first century, inspiring a continuous production of monuments, novels, movies and television soap operas. Focusing on statues and monuments as material mediators in the domains of popular religiosity, nationalism and entertainment, this chapter explores the present-day popularity of Siamese royal historiography.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMonarchies and Decolonization in Asia
EditorsRobert Aldrich, Cindy McCreery
PublisherManchester University Press
Chapter15
ISBN (Electronic)9781526142702
ISBN (Print)9781526142696
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Publication series

NameStudies in Imperialism
PublisherManchester University Press

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dramatising Siamese independence: Thai postcolonial perspectives on kingship'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this