Dupin v. France: the ECtHR going old school in its appraisal of inclusive education?

  • J. Lievens
  • , Marie Spinoy

Research output: Web publication or Non-textual formWeb publication or WebsiteAcademic

69 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In Dupin v. France the European Court of Human Rights saw itself confronted with one of the key conflicts in education law: when parents and state officials disagree on which educational trajectory is best for a child with a disability, who gets the final say? This case concerned a mother fighting the decision of the French authorities to refuse her child, who has Autism Spectrum Disorder, access to a general school (through a form of inclusive education). Instead, the child was referred to an ‘Institut medico-éducatif’, an institution established to provide care and a specialized type of education to children with an intellectual impairment. Seemingly going back on its prior case law, the Court did not consider the right to education of the child to be violated.
Original languageEnglish
Media of outputOnline
Publication statusPublished - 11 Feb 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dupin v. France: the ECtHR going old school in its appraisal of inclusive education?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this