Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Dutch Economic Value of Radium-223 in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

  • Michel L. Peters
  • , Claudine de Meijer
  • , Dirk Wyndaele
  • , Walter Noordzij
  • , Annemarie M. Leliveld-Kors
  • , Joan van den Bosch
  • , Pieter H. van den Berg
  • , Agni Baka
  • , Jennifer G. Gaultney*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: The treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer has changed with the introduction of radium-223, cabazitaxel, abiraterone and enzalutamide. To assess value for money, their cost effectiveness in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel from the Dutch societal perspective was investigated. Methods: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using efficacy, symptomatic skeletal-related event and safety data obtained from indirect treatment comparisons. Missing skeletal-related event data for cabazitaxel were conservatively assumed to be identical to radium-223. A Markov model combined these clinical inputs with Dutch-specific resource use and costs for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treatment from a societal perspective. Total quality-adjusted life-years and costs in 2017 euros were calculated over a 5-year (lifetime) time horizon. Results: Radium-223 resulted in €6092 and €4465 lower costs and 0.02 and 0.01 higher quality-adjusted life-years compared with abiraterone and cabazitaxel, respectively, demonstrating dominance of radium-223. Sensitivity analyses reveal a 64% (54%) chance of radium-223 being cost effective compared with abiraterone (cabazitaxel) at the informal €80,000 willingness-to-pay threshold. Compared with enzalutamide, radium-223 resulted in slightly lower quality-adjusted life-years (−0.06) and €7390 lower costs, revealing a 61% chance of radium-223 being cost effective compared with enzalutamide. The lower costs of radium-223 compared with abiraterone and enzalutamide are driven by lower drug costs and prevention of expensive skeletal-related events. Compared with cabazitaxel, the lower costs of radium-223 are driven by lower costs of the drug, administration and adverse events. Conclusion: Radium-223 may be a less costly treatment strategy offering similar gains in health benefits compared with abiraterone, cabazitaxel and enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel from the Dutch societal perspective.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)133-143
Number of pages11
JournalApplied health economics and health policy
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2018
Externally publishedYes

Funding

Funding Mapi Group was financially supported by Bayer B. V. to perform the study.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dutch Economic Value of Radium-223 in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this