ECJ Judges read the morning papers. Explaining the turnaround of European citizenship jurisprudence

Michael Blauberger, Anita Heindlmaier, Dion Kramer, Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen, Jessica Sampson Thierry, Angelika Schenk, Benjamin Werner

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Recent jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) marks a striking shift towards a more restrictive interpretation of EU citizens’ rights. The Court's turnaround is not only highly relevant for practical debates about ‘Social Europe’ or ‘welfare migration’, but also enlightening from a more general, theoretical viewpoint. Several recent studies on the ECJ have argued that the Court is largely constrained by member state governments’ threats of legislative override and non-compliance. We show that an additional mechanism is necessary to explain the Court's turnaround on citizenship. While the ECJ extended EU citizens’ rights even against strong opposition by member state governments, its recent shift reflects changes in the broader political context, i.e., the politicization of free movement in the European Union (EU). The article theorises Court responsiveness to politicization and demonstrates empirically, how the Court's jurisprudence corresponds with changing public debates about EU citizenship.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1422-1441
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of European Public Policy
Volume25
Issue number10
Early online date28 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

European Court of Justice
jurisprudence
citizenship
politicization
citizen
opposition
welfare
migration
threat
interpretation

Bibliographical note

Special Issue: Free movement and non-discrimination in an unequal Union

Keywords

  • EU citizenship
  • European Court of Justice
  • free movement
  • judicial independence
  • judicial responsiveness
  • politicization

Cite this

Blauberger, M., Heindlmaier, A., Kramer, D., Martinsen, D. S., Sampson Thierry, J., Schenk, A., & Werner, B. (2018). ECJ Judges read the morning papers. Explaining the turnaround of European citizenship jurisprudence. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(10), 1422-1441. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1488880
Blauberger, Michael ; Heindlmaier, Anita ; Kramer, Dion ; Martinsen, Dorte Sindbjerg ; Sampson Thierry, Jessica ; Schenk, Angelika ; Werner, Benjamin. / ECJ Judges read the morning papers. Explaining the turnaround of European citizenship jurisprudence. In: Journal of European Public Policy. 2018 ; Vol. 25, No. 10. pp. 1422-1441.
@article{6e6093bc40eb4e879a0da2b6f401e315,
title = "ECJ Judges read the morning papers. Explaining the turnaround of European citizenship jurisprudence",
abstract = "Recent jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) marks a striking shift towards a more restrictive interpretation of EU citizens’ rights. The Court's turnaround is not only highly relevant for practical debates about ‘Social Europe’ or ‘welfare migration’, but also enlightening from a more general, theoretical viewpoint. Several recent studies on the ECJ have argued that the Court is largely constrained by member state governments’ threats of legislative override and non-compliance. We show that an additional mechanism is necessary to explain the Court's turnaround on citizenship. While the ECJ extended EU citizens’ rights even against strong opposition by member state governments, its recent shift reflects changes in the broader political context, i.e., the politicization of free movement in the European Union (EU). The article theorises Court responsiveness to politicization and demonstrates empirically, how the Court's jurisprudence corresponds with changing public debates about EU citizenship.",
keywords = "EU citizenship, European Court of Justice, free movement, judicial independence, judicial responsiveness, politicization",
author = "Michael Blauberger and Anita Heindlmaier and Dion Kramer and Martinsen, {Dorte Sindbjerg} and {Sampson Thierry}, Jessica and Angelika Schenk and Benjamin Werner",
note = "Special Issue: Free movement and non-discrimination in an unequal Union",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/13501763.2018.1488880",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "1422--1441",
journal = "Journal of European Public Policy",
issn = "1350-1763",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "10",

}

Blauberger, M, Heindlmaier, A, Kramer, D, Martinsen, DS, Sampson Thierry, J, Schenk, A & Werner, B 2018, 'ECJ Judges read the morning papers. Explaining the turnaround of European citizenship jurisprudence' Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 1422-1441. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1488880

ECJ Judges read the morning papers. Explaining the turnaround of European citizenship jurisprudence. / Blauberger, Michael; Heindlmaier, Anita; Kramer, Dion; Martinsen, Dorte Sindbjerg; Sampson Thierry, Jessica; Schenk, Angelika; Werner, Benjamin.

In: Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 25, No. 10, 03.10.2018, p. 1422-1441.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - ECJ Judges read the morning papers. Explaining the turnaround of European citizenship jurisprudence

AU - Blauberger, Michael

AU - Heindlmaier, Anita

AU - Kramer, Dion

AU - Martinsen, Dorte Sindbjerg

AU - Sampson Thierry, Jessica

AU - Schenk, Angelika

AU - Werner, Benjamin

N1 - Special Issue: Free movement and non-discrimination in an unequal Union

PY - 2018/10/3

Y1 - 2018/10/3

N2 - Recent jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) marks a striking shift towards a more restrictive interpretation of EU citizens’ rights. The Court's turnaround is not only highly relevant for practical debates about ‘Social Europe’ or ‘welfare migration’, but also enlightening from a more general, theoretical viewpoint. Several recent studies on the ECJ have argued that the Court is largely constrained by member state governments’ threats of legislative override and non-compliance. We show that an additional mechanism is necessary to explain the Court's turnaround on citizenship. While the ECJ extended EU citizens’ rights even against strong opposition by member state governments, its recent shift reflects changes in the broader political context, i.e., the politicization of free movement in the European Union (EU). The article theorises Court responsiveness to politicization and demonstrates empirically, how the Court's jurisprudence corresponds with changing public debates about EU citizenship.

AB - Recent jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) marks a striking shift towards a more restrictive interpretation of EU citizens’ rights. The Court's turnaround is not only highly relevant for practical debates about ‘Social Europe’ or ‘welfare migration’, but also enlightening from a more general, theoretical viewpoint. Several recent studies on the ECJ have argued that the Court is largely constrained by member state governments’ threats of legislative override and non-compliance. We show that an additional mechanism is necessary to explain the Court's turnaround on citizenship. While the ECJ extended EU citizens’ rights even against strong opposition by member state governments, its recent shift reflects changes in the broader political context, i.e., the politicization of free movement in the European Union (EU). The article theorises Court responsiveness to politicization and demonstrates empirically, how the Court's jurisprudence corresponds with changing public debates about EU citizenship.

KW - EU citizenship

KW - European Court of Justice

KW - free movement

KW - judicial independence

KW - judicial responsiveness

KW - politicization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048067713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048067713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13501763.2018.1488880

DO - 10.1080/13501763.2018.1488880

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 1422

EP - 1441

JO - Journal of European Public Policy

JF - Journal of European Public Policy

SN - 1350-1763

IS - 10

ER -