case note in case C-641/17. In this case, a Canadian pension fund successfully claims that if it cannot fully refund of German dividend withholding tax, there is a violation of the fee movement of capital of Article 63 TFEU. The decision of the ECJ in this case is also important for pension funds who are established in other jurisdictions
title = "HvJ EU: strijdigheid met het vrije verkeer van kapitaal van artikel 63 VwEU.",
abstract = "case note in case C-641/17. In this case, a Canadian pension fund successfully claims that if it cannot fully refund of German dividend withholding tax, there is a violation of the fee movement of capital of Article 63 TFEU. The decision of the ECJ in this case is also important for pension funds who are established in other jurisdictions",
No. C-641/17, 2020. Nov 13, 2019. (Pensioen Jurisprudentie).
Research output: Case Note › Case note › Academic
TY - GEN
T1 - HvJ EU: strijdigheid met het vrije verkeer van kapitaal van artikel 63 VwEU.
AU - Dieleman, Bas
PY - 2020/2/1
Y1 - 2020/2/1
N2 - case note in case C-641/17. In this case, a Canadian pension fund successfully claims that if it cannot fully refund of German dividend withholding tax, there is a violation of the fee movement of capital of Article 63 TFEU. The decision of the ECJ in this case is also important for pension funds who are established in other jurisdictions
AB - case note in case C-641/17. In this case, a Canadian pension fund successfully claims that if it cannot fully refund of German dividend withholding tax, there is a violation of the fee movement of capital of Article 63 TFEU. The decision of the ECJ in this case is also important for pension funds who are established in other jurisdictions