Case note: HvJ EU (C-641/17: strijdigheid met het vrije verkeer van kapitaal van artikel 63 VwEU.)

Bas Dieleman

Case note: HvJ EU (C-641/17: strijdigheid met het vrije verkeer van kapitaal van artikel 63 VwEU.)

Translated title of the contribution: ECJ: violation of the free movement of capital of Article 63 TFEU

Research output: Case Note › Case note › Academic

Abstract

case note in case C-641/17. In this case, a Canadian pension fund successfully claims that if it cannot fully refund of German dividend withholding tax, there is a violation of the fee movement of capital of Article 63 TFEU. The decision of the ECJ in this case is also important for pension funds who are established in other jurisdictions

Translated title of the contribution	ECJ: violation of the free movement of capital of Article 63 TFEU
Original language	Dutch
Project No.	C-641/17
Finished	13/11/19
Publication status	Published - 1 Feb 2020

Publication series

Name	Pensioen Jurisprudentie

Access to Document

https://www.navigator.nl/document/id5e03758822194b4094e65907e43cab28?ctx=WKNL_CSL_108

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'ECJ: violation of the free movement of capital of Article 63 TFEU'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@misc{13b9aa6fee7f4b71b7ee30cf9813939a,

title = "Case note: HvJ EU (C-641/17: strijdigheid met het vrije verkeer van kapitaal van artikel 63 VwEU.)",

abstract = "case note in case C-641/17. In this case, a Canadian pension fund successfully claims that if it cannot fully refund of German dividend withholding tax, there is a violation of the fee movement of capital of Article 63 TFEU. The decision of the ECJ in this case is also important for pension funds who are established in other jurisdictions",

author = "Bas Dieleman",

year = "2020",

month = feb,

day = "1",

language = "Dutch",

series = "Pensioen Jurisprudentie",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Case note: HvJ EU (C-641/17: strijdigheid met het vrije verkeer van kapitaal van artikel 63 VwEU.)

AU - Dieleman, Bas

PY - 2020/2/1

Y1 - 2020/2/1

N2 - case note in case C-641/17. In this case, a Canadian pension fund successfully claims that if it cannot fully refund of German dividend withholding tax, there is a violation of the fee movement of capital of Article 63 TFEU. The decision of the ECJ in this case is also important for pension funds who are established in other jurisdictions

AB - case note in case C-641/17. In this case, a Canadian pension fund successfully claims that if it cannot fully refund of German dividend withholding tax, there is a violation of the fee movement of capital of Article 63 TFEU. The decision of the ECJ in this case is also important for pension funds who are established in other jurisdictions

M3 - Case note

T3 - Pensioen Jurisprudentie

ER -