Ecological Footprint Policy? Land Use as an Environmental Indicator

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Summary: This article argues that policies aimed at sustainability need to address the spatial dimensions of environmental problems and their solutions. In particular, spatial configurations of economic activities deserve attention, which means addressing land use, infrastructure, trade, and transport. Unfortunately, good theory and indicators to support the analysis and design of spatial-environmental policies are not fully developed. One approach that has become very popular in the last decade is the ecological footprint (EF). It is both an environmental accounting tool and aggregate indicator, which is used by scientists, environmental organizations, and popular media. Despite criticisms of the EF method in the past, its popularity has only increased. In fact, an increasing number of publications with an application of the EF appear in scientific journals. We review the EF approach from indicator-methodology and welfare angles and assess its policy relevance. Our conclusion is that it does not offer any meaningful information for public policy. © 2013 by Yale University.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10-19
JournalJournal of Industrial Ecology
Volume18
Issue number1
Early online date25 Jul 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

ecological footprint
environmental indicator
land use
scientific journal
environmental policy
popularity
environmental impact
public policy
criticism
welfare
sustainability
economic activity
infrastructure
methodology
economics
policy
indicator

Cite this

@article{05c61518286b40abad2b7ed947b0b25a,
title = "Ecological Footprint Policy? Land Use as an Environmental Indicator",
abstract = "Summary: This article argues that policies aimed at sustainability need to address the spatial dimensions of environmental problems and their solutions. In particular, spatial configurations of economic activities deserve attention, which means addressing land use, infrastructure, trade, and transport. Unfortunately, good theory and indicators to support the analysis and design of spatial-environmental policies are not fully developed. One approach that has become very popular in the last decade is the ecological footprint (EF). It is both an environmental accounting tool and aggregate indicator, which is used by scientists, environmental organizations, and popular media. Despite criticisms of the EF method in the past, its popularity has only increased. In fact, an increasing number of publications with an application of the EF appear in scientific journals. We review the EF approach from indicator-methodology and welfare angles and assess its policy relevance. Our conclusion is that it does not offer any meaningful information for public policy. {\circledC} 2013 by Yale University.",
author = "{van den Bergh}, J.C.J.M. and F. Grazi",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1111/jiec.12045",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "10--19",
journal = "Journal of Industrial Ecology",
issn = "1088-1980",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Ecological Footprint Policy? Land Use as an Environmental Indicator. / van den Bergh, J.C.J.M.; Grazi, F.

In: Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2014, p. 10-19.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ecological Footprint Policy? Land Use as an Environmental Indicator

AU - van den Bergh, J.C.J.M.

AU - Grazi, F.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Summary: This article argues that policies aimed at sustainability need to address the spatial dimensions of environmental problems and their solutions. In particular, spatial configurations of economic activities deserve attention, which means addressing land use, infrastructure, trade, and transport. Unfortunately, good theory and indicators to support the analysis and design of spatial-environmental policies are not fully developed. One approach that has become very popular in the last decade is the ecological footprint (EF). It is both an environmental accounting tool and aggregate indicator, which is used by scientists, environmental organizations, and popular media. Despite criticisms of the EF method in the past, its popularity has only increased. In fact, an increasing number of publications with an application of the EF appear in scientific journals. We review the EF approach from indicator-methodology and welfare angles and assess its policy relevance. Our conclusion is that it does not offer any meaningful information for public policy. © 2013 by Yale University.

AB - Summary: This article argues that policies aimed at sustainability need to address the spatial dimensions of environmental problems and their solutions. In particular, spatial configurations of economic activities deserve attention, which means addressing land use, infrastructure, trade, and transport. Unfortunately, good theory and indicators to support the analysis and design of spatial-environmental policies are not fully developed. One approach that has become very popular in the last decade is the ecological footprint (EF). It is both an environmental accounting tool and aggregate indicator, which is used by scientists, environmental organizations, and popular media. Despite criticisms of the EF method in the past, its popularity has only increased. In fact, an increasing number of publications with an application of the EF appear in scientific journals. We review the EF approach from indicator-methodology and welfare angles and assess its policy relevance. Our conclusion is that it does not offer any meaningful information for public policy. © 2013 by Yale University.

U2 - 10.1111/jiec.12045

DO - 10.1111/jiec.12045

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 10

EP - 19

JO - Journal of Industrial Ecology

JF - Journal of Industrial Ecology

SN - 1088-1980

IS - 1

ER -