Economic evaluation of an internet-based stress management intervention alongside a randomized controlled trial

Fanny Kählke, Claudia Buntrock, Filip Smit, Matthias Berking, Dirk Lehr, Elena Heber, Burkhardt Funk, Heleen Riper, David Daniel Ebert

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Work-related stress is widespread among employees and associated with high costs for German society. Internet-based stress management interventions (iSMIs) are effective in reducing such stress. However, evidence for their cost-effectiveness is scant. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of a guided iSMI for employees. Methods: A sample of 264 employees with elevated symptoms of perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale≥22) was assigned to either the iSMI or a waitlist control condition (WLC) with unrestricted access to treatment as usual. Participants were recruited in Germany in 2013 and followed through 2014, and data were analyzed in 2017. The iSMI consisted of 7 sessions plus 1 booster session. It was based on problem-solving therapy and emotion regulation techniques. Costs were measured from the societal perspective, including all direct and indirect medical costs. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis and a cost-utility analysis relating costs to a symptom-free person and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, respectively. Sampling uncertainty was handled using nonparametric bootstrapping (N=5000). Results: When the society is not willing to pay anything to get an additional symptom-free person (eg, willingness-to-pay [WTP]=0), there was a 70% probability that the intervention is more cost-effective than WLC. This probability rose to 85% and 93% when the society is willing to pay 1000 and 2000, respectively, for achieving an additional symptom-free person. The cost-utility analysis yielded a 76% probability that the intervention is more cost-effective than WLC at a conservative WTP threshold of 20,000 (US $25,800) per QALY gained. Conclusions: Offering an iSMI to stressed employees has an acceptable likelihood of being cost-effective compared with WLC.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere10866
JournalJournal of Medical Internet Research
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2019

Fingerprint

Internet
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Randomized Controlled Trials
Costs and Cost Analysis
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Uncertainty
Germany
Emotions

Keywords

  • Clinical trials, randomized
  • Economic evaluation
  • Internet
  • Occupational stress
  • Quality of life
  • Work

Cite this

Kählke, Fanny ; Buntrock, Claudia ; Smit, Filip ; Berking, Matthias ; Lehr, Dirk ; Heber, Elena ; Funk, Burkhardt ; Riper, Heleen ; Ebert, David Daniel. / Economic evaluation of an internet-based stress management intervention alongside a randomized controlled trial. In: Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2019 ; Vol. 21, No. 5.
@article{0691e9ded4074b809d31382b4b868cd0,
title = "Economic evaluation of an internet-based stress management intervention alongside a randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Background: Work-related stress is widespread among employees and associated with high costs for German society. Internet-based stress management interventions (iSMIs) are effective in reducing such stress. However, evidence for their cost-effectiveness is scant. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of a guided iSMI for employees. Methods: A sample of 264 employees with elevated symptoms of perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale≥22) was assigned to either the iSMI or a waitlist control condition (WLC) with unrestricted access to treatment as usual. Participants were recruited in Germany in 2013 and followed through 2014, and data were analyzed in 2017. The iSMI consisted of 7 sessions plus 1 booster session. It was based on problem-solving therapy and emotion regulation techniques. Costs were measured from the societal perspective, including all direct and indirect medical costs. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis and a cost-utility analysis relating costs to a symptom-free person and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, respectively. Sampling uncertainty was handled using nonparametric bootstrapping (N=5000). Results: When the society is not willing to pay anything to get an additional symptom-free person (eg, willingness-to-pay [WTP]=0), there was a 70{\%} probability that the intervention is more cost-effective than WLC. This probability rose to 85{\%} and 93{\%} when the society is willing to pay 1000 and 2000, respectively, for achieving an additional symptom-free person. The cost-utility analysis yielded a 76{\%} probability that the intervention is more cost-effective than WLC at a conservative WTP threshold of 20,000 (US $25,800) per QALY gained. Conclusions: Offering an iSMI to stressed employees has an acceptable likelihood of being cost-effective compared with WLC.",
keywords = "Clinical trials, randomized, Economic evaluation, Internet, Occupational stress, Quality of life, Work",
author = "Fanny K{\"a}hlke and Claudia Buntrock and Filip Smit and Matthias Berking and Dirk Lehr and Elena Heber and Burkhardt Funk and Heleen Riper and Ebert, {David Daniel}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2196/10866",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
journal = "Journal of Medical Internet Research",
issn = "1438-8871",
publisher = "Journal of medical Internet Research",
number = "5",

}

Economic evaluation of an internet-based stress management intervention alongside a randomized controlled trial. / Kählke, Fanny; Buntrock, Claudia; Smit, Filip; Berking, Matthias; Lehr, Dirk; Heber, Elena; Funk, Burkhardt; Riper, Heleen; Ebert, David Daniel.

In: Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 21, No. 5, e10866, 01.05.2019.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Economic evaluation of an internet-based stress management intervention alongside a randomized controlled trial

AU - Kählke, Fanny

AU - Buntrock, Claudia

AU - Smit, Filip

AU - Berking, Matthias

AU - Lehr, Dirk

AU - Heber, Elena

AU - Funk, Burkhardt

AU - Riper, Heleen

AU - Ebert, David Daniel

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Background: Work-related stress is widespread among employees and associated with high costs for German society. Internet-based stress management interventions (iSMIs) are effective in reducing such stress. However, evidence for their cost-effectiveness is scant. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of a guided iSMI for employees. Methods: A sample of 264 employees with elevated symptoms of perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale≥22) was assigned to either the iSMI or a waitlist control condition (WLC) with unrestricted access to treatment as usual. Participants were recruited in Germany in 2013 and followed through 2014, and data were analyzed in 2017. The iSMI consisted of 7 sessions plus 1 booster session. It was based on problem-solving therapy and emotion regulation techniques. Costs were measured from the societal perspective, including all direct and indirect medical costs. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis and a cost-utility analysis relating costs to a symptom-free person and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, respectively. Sampling uncertainty was handled using nonparametric bootstrapping (N=5000). Results: When the society is not willing to pay anything to get an additional symptom-free person (eg, willingness-to-pay [WTP]=0), there was a 70% probability that the intervention is more cost-effective than WLC. This probability rose to 85% and 93% when the society is willing to pay 1000 and 2000, respectively, for achieving an additional symptom-free person. The cost-utility analysis yielded a 76% probability that the intervention is more cost-effective than WLC at a conservative WTP threshold of 20,000 (US $25,800) per QALY gained. Conclusions: Offering an iSMI to stressed employees has an acceptable likelihood of being cost-effective compared with WLC.

AB - Background: Work-related stress is widespread among employees and associated with high costs for German society. Internet-based stress management interventions (iSMIs) are effective in reducing such stress. However, evidence for their cost-effectiveness is scant. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of a guided iSMI for employees. Methods: A sample of 264 employees with elevated symptoms of perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale≥22) was assigned to either the iSMI or a waitlist control condition (WLC) with unrestricted access to treatment as usual. Participants were recruited in Germany in 2013 and followed through 2014, and data were analyzed in 2017. The iSMI consisted of 7 sessions plus 1 booster session. It was based on problem-solving therapy and emotion regulation techniques. Costs were measured from the societal perspective, including all direct and indirect medical costs. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis and a cost-utility analysis relating costs to a symptom-free person and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, respectively. Sampling uncertainty was handled using nonparametric bootstrapping (N=5000). Results: When the society is not willing to pay anything to get an additional symptom-free person (eg, willingness-to-pay [WTP]=0), there was a 70% probability that the intervention is more cost-effective than WLC. This probability rose to 85% and 93% when the society is willing to pay 1000 and 2000, respectively, for achieving an additional symptom-free person. The cost-utility analysis yielded a 76% probability that the intervention is more cost-effective than WLC at a conservative WTP threshold of 20,000 (US $25,800) per QALY gained. Conclusions: Offering an iSMI to stressed employees has an acceptable likelihood of being cost-effective compared with WLC.

KW - Clinical trials, randomized

KW - Economic evaluation

KW - Internet

KW - Occupational stress

KW - Quality of life

KW - Work

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067416391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067416391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2196/10866

DO - 10.2196/10866

M3 - Article

VL - 21

JO - Journal of Medical Internet Research

JF - Journal of Medical Internet Research

SN - 1438-8871

IS - 5

M1 - e10866

ER -