TY - JOUR
T1 - Economic evaluations of diagnostic tests, treatment and prevention for lateral ankle sprains: a systematic review
AU - Lin, Chung-Wei Christine
AU - Uegaki, Kimi
AU - Coupé, Veerle M H
AU - Kerkhoffs, Gino M
AU - Tulder, M.W. van
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To assess and summarise the economic evidence regarding diagnostic tests, treatment and prevention for lateral ankle sprains.METHODS: Potential studies were identified from electronic databases and trial registries and by scanning reference lists. Risk of bias and methodological quality were evaluated. Two independent reviewers screened, assessed studies and extracted data. Data were synthesised descriptively due to study heterogeneity.RESULTS: A total of 230 records were identified; 10 studies were included. Five studies conducted a full economic evaluation and five studies involved cost analyses. Lack of blinding was the main risk of bias. The methodological quality of the full economic evaluations was fairly good. Valuation of costs, measurement of outcomes and sensitivity analysis were points for improvement. Single studies showed that the Ottawa ankle rules (OAR) was cost effective for diagnosing lateral ankle sprains in the emergency setting compared with existing hospital protocols; acute treatment with anti-inflammatory medication and the plaster cast for severe sprains appeared cost effective; and neuromuscular training was cost effective in preventing ankle re-injury.CONCLUSIONS: Results of this current systematic review supplements the evidence provided by reviews of effectiveness. There is evidence to support the implementation of OAR in the emergency setting, the use of anti-inflammatory medication and the plaster cast in the acute phase, and the prescription of neuromuscular exercises to prevent re-injury. Although the evidence is limited due to the low number of studies, shortcomings in methodological quality and small sample sizes, the findings may be used to inform clinical practice and practice guidelines.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To assess and summarise the economic evidence regarding diagnostic tests, treatment and prevention for lateral ankle sprains.METHODS: Potential studies were identified from electronic databases and trial registries and by scanning reference lists. Risk of bias and methodological quality were evaluated. Two independent reviewers screened, assessed studies and extracted data. Data were synthesised descriptively due to study heterogeneity.RESULTS: A total of 230 records were identified; 10 studies were included. Five studies conducted a full economic evaluation and five studies involved cost analyses. Lack of blinding was the main risk of bias. The methodological quality of the full economic evaluations was fairly good. Valuation of costs, measurement of outcomes and sensitivity analysis were points for improvement. Single studies showed that the Ottawa ankle rules (OAR) was cost effective for diagnosing lateral ankle sprains in the emergency setting compared with existing hospital protocols; acute treatment with anti-inflammatory medication and the plaster cast for severe sprains appeared cost effective; and neuromuscular training was cost effective in preventing ankle re-injury.CONCLUSIONS: Results of this current systematic review supplements the evidence provided by reviews of effectiveness. There is evidence to support the implementation of OAR in the emergency setting, the use of anti-inflammatory medication and the plaster cast in the acute phase, and the prescription of neuromuscular exercises to prevent re-injury. Although the evidence is limited due to the low number of studies, shortcomings in methodological quality and small sample sizes, the findings may be used to inform clinical practice and practice guidelines.
UR - https://pure.au.dk/portal/en/publications/economic-evaluations-of-diagnostic-tests-treatment-and-prevention-for-lateral-ankle-sprains-a-systematic-review(7939b9f0-6b62-4e8a-80e9-afbe278d126a).html
U2 - 10.1136/bjsports-2012-090319
DO - 10.1136/bjsports-2012-090319
M3 - Article
C2 - 22554849
SN - 0306-3674
JO - British Journal of Sports Medicine
JF - British Journal of Sports Medicine
ER -