Economic motivation for raising coastal flood defenses in Europe

Michalis I. Vousdoukas; Lorenzo Mentaschi; Jochen Hinkel; Philip J. Ward; Ignazio Mongelli; Juan Carlos Ciscar; Luc Feyen

doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15665-3

Economic motivation for raising coastal flood defenses in Europe

Michalis I. Vousdoukas^*
, Lorenzo Mentaschi
, Jochen Hinkel
, Philip J. Ward
, Ignazio Mongelli
, Juan Carlos Ciscar
, Luc Feyen

^*Corresponding author for this work

Water and Climate Risk

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Extreme sea levels (ESLs) in Europe could rise by as much as one metre or more by the end of this century due to climate change. This poses significant challenges to safeguard coastal communities. Here we present a comprehensive analysis of economically efficient protection scenarios along Europe’s coastlines during the present century. We employ a probabilistic framework that integrates dynamic simulations of all ESL components and flood inundation, impact modelling and a cost-benefit analysis of raising dykes. We find that at least 83% of flood damages in Europe could be avoided by elevating dykes in an economically efficient way along 23.7%-32.1% of Europe’s coastline, specifically where high value conurbations exist. The European mean benefit to cost ratio of the investments varies from 8.3 to 14.9 while at country level this ranges between 1.6 and 34.3, with higher efficiencies for a scenario with high-end greenhouse gas emissions and strong socio-economic growth.

Original language	English
Article number	2119
Pages (from-to)	1-11
Number of pages	11
Journal	Nature Communications
Volume	11
Issue number	1
Early online date	5 May 2020
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15665-3
Publication status	Published - 5 May 2020

Funding

P.J.W. received additional funding from the Dutch Research Council (NWO) in the form of a VIDI grant (grant no. 016.161.324). J.H. has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Programme under the COACCH project (Grant agreement no. 776479) and from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research through the ERA4CS project ISIPEDIA (Grant no. 01LS1711C).

Funders	Funder number
European Union’s Horizon 2020 programme
NWO	016.161.324
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme	776479
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung	01LS1711C

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 13 Climate Action
SDG 14 Life Below Water

Access to Document

10.1038/s41467-020-15665-3

Persistent URL (handle)

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{4963c9ede4b7416692bf9e4be0c253b7,

title = "Economic motivation for raising coastal flood defenses in Europe",

abstract = "Extreme sea levels (ESLs) in Europe could rise by as much as one metre or more by the end of this century due to climate change. This poses significant challenges to safeguard coastal communities. Here we present a comprehensive analysis of economically efficient protection scenarios along Europe{\textquoteright}s coastlines during the present century. We employ a probabilistic framework that integrates dynamic simulations of all ESL components and flood inundation, impact modelling and a cost-benefit analysis of raising dykes. We find that at least 83\% of flood damages in Europe could be avoided by elevating dykes in an economically efficient way along 23.7\%-32.1\% of Europe{\textquoteright}s coastline, specifically where high value conurbations exist. The European mean benefit to cost ratio of the investments varies from 8.3 to 14.9 while at country level this ranges between 1.6 and 34.3, with higher efficiencies for a scenario with high-end greenhouse gas emissions and strong socio-economic growth.",

author = "Vousdoukas, \{Michalis I.\} and Lorenzo Mentaschi and Jochen Hinkel and Ward, \{Philip J.\} and Ignazio Mongelli and Ciscar, \{Juan Carlos\} and Luc Feyen",

year = "2020",

month = may,

day = "5",

doi = "10.1038/s41467-020-15665-3",

language = "English",

volume = "11",

pages = "1--11",

journal = "Nature Communications",

issn = "2041-1723",

publisher = "Nature Research",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Economic motivation for raising coastal flood defenses in Europe

AU - Vousdoukas, Michalis I.

AU - Mentaschi, Lorenzo

AU - Hinkel, Jochen

AU - Ward, Philip J.

AU - Mongelli, Ignazio

AU - Ciscar, Juan Carlos

AU - Feyen, Luc

PY - 2020/5/5

Y1 - 2020/5/5

N2 - Extreme sea levels (ESLs) in Europe could rise by as much as one metre or more by the end of this century due to climate change. This poses significant challenges to safeguard coastal communities. Here we present a comprehensive analysis of economically efficient protection scenarios along Europe’s coastlines during the present century. We employ a probabilistic framework that integrates dynamic simulations of all ESL components and flood inundation, impact modelling and a cost-benefit analysis of raising dykes. We find that at least 83% of flood damages in Europe could be avoided by elevating dykes in an economically efficient way along 23.7%-32.1% of Europe’s coastline, specifically where high value conurbations exist. The European mean benefit to cost ratio of the investments varies from 8.3 to 14.9 while at country level this ranges between 1.6 and 34.3, with higher efficiencies for a scenario with high-end greenhouse gas emissions and strong socio-economic growth.

AB - Extreme sea levels (ESLs) in Europe could rise by as much as one metre or more by the end of this century due to climate change. This poses significant challenges to safeguard coastal communities. Here we present a comprehensive analysis of economically efficient protection scenarios along Europe’s coastlines during the present century. We employ a probabilistic framework that integrates dynamic simulations of all ESL components and flood inundation, impact modelling and a cost-benefit analysis of raising dykes. We find that at least 83% of flood damages in Europe could be avoided by elevating dykes in an economically efficient way along 23.7%-32.1% of Europe’s coastline, specifically where high value conurbations exist. The European mean benefit to cost ratio of the investments varies from 8.3 to 14.9 while at country level this ranges between 1.6 and 34.3, with higher efficiencies for a scenario with high-end greenhouse gas emissions and strong socio-economic growth.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85084179569

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85084179569#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1038/s41467-020-15665-3

DO - 10.1038/s41467-020-15665-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 32371866

AN - SCOPUS:85084179569

SN - 2041-1723

VL - 11

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Nature Communications

JF - Nature Communications

IS - 1

M1 - 2119

ER -

Economic motivation for raising coastal flood defenses in Europe

Abstract

Funding

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Persistent URL (handle)

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this