TY - JOUR
T1 - Ecosystem services in European protected areas
T2 - Ambiguity in the views of scientists and managers?
AU - Hummel, Christiaan
AU - Provenzale, Antonello
AU - Van Der Meer, Jaap
AU - Wijnhoven, Sander
AU - Nolte, Arno
AU - Poursanidis, Dimitris
AU - Janss, Guyonne
AU - Jurek, Matthias
AU - Andresen, Magnus
AU - Poulin, Brigitte
AU - Kobler, Johannes
AU - Beierkuhnlein, Carl
AU - Honrado, João
AU - Razinkovas, Arturas
AU - Stritih, Ana
AU - Bargmann, Tessa
AU - Ziemba, Alex
AU - Bonet-García, Francisco
AU - Adamescu, Mihai Cristian
AU - Janssen, Gerard
AU - Hummel, Herman
PY - 2017/11/15
Y1 - 2017/11/15
N2 - Protected Areas are a key component of nature conservation. They can play an important role in counterbalancing the impacts of ecosystem degradation. For an optimal protection of a Protected Area it is essential to account for the variables underlying the major Ecosystem Services an area delivers, and the threats upon them. Here we show that the perception of these important variables differs markedly between scientists and managers of Protected Areas in mountains and transitional waters. Scientists emphasise variables of abiotic and biotic nature, whereas managers highlight socio-economic, cultural and anthropogenic variables. This indicates fundamental differences in perception. To be able to better protect an area it would be advisable to bring the perception of scientists and managers closer together. Intensified and harmonised communication across disciplinary and professional boundaries will be needed to implement and improve Ecosystem Service oriented management strategies in current and future Protected Areas.
AB - Protected Areas are a key component of nature conservation. They can play an important role in counterbalancing the impacts of ecosystem degradation. For an optimal protection of a Protected Area it is essential to account for the variables underlying the major Ecosystem Services an area delivers, and the threats upon them. Here we show that the perception of these important variables differs markedly between scientists and managers of Protected Areas in mountains and transitional waters. Scientists emphasise variables of abiotic and biotic nature, whereas managers highlight socio-economic, cultural and anthropogenic variables. This indicates fundamental differences in perception. To be able to better protect an area it would be advisable to bring the perception of scientists and managers closer together. Intensified and harmonised communication across disciplinary and professional boundaries will be needed to implement and improve Ecosystem Service oriented management strategies in current and future Protected Areas.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034037218&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034037218&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0187143
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0187143
M3 - Article
C2 - 29140983
AN - SCOPUS:85034037218
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 12
SP - 1
EP - 14
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 11
M1 - e0187143
ER -