Educational differences in the validity of self-reported physical activity

A.N. Winckers, J.D. Mackenbach, S. Compernolle, M. Nicolaou, H.P. van der Ploeg, I. de Bourdeaudhuij, J. Brug, J. Lakerveld

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: The assessment of physical activity for surveillance or population based studies is usually done with self-report questionnaires. However, bias in self-reported physical activity may be greater in lower educated than in higher educated populations. The aim of the present study is to describe educational differences in the validity of self-reported physical activity. Methods: We included 196 healthy adults (age 57 ± 15.4, of whom 17 % low, 24 % medium and 59 % high educated). Criterion validity of an adapted International Physical Activity Questionnaire was assessed against the ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer. Results: While criterion validity of self-reported physical activity was low to moderate in the total sample (Spearman rho ranged from 0.16 to 0.27, depending on the variables used), the validity in lower educated respondents was poor (-0.07 to 0.05). Conclusions: The results confirm the hypothesis that self-report physical activity questionnaires are less valid in lower educated populations.
Original languageEnglish
Article number1299
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Educational differences in the validity of self-reported physical activity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this