EEG dynamics reveal a dissociation between storage and selective attention within working memory

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Selective attention plays a prominent role in prioritizing information in working memory (WM), improving performance for attended representations. However, it remains unclear whether unattended WM representations suffer from information loss. Here we tested the hypothesis that within WM, selectively attending to an item and stopping storing other items are independent mechanisms. We recorded EEG while participants performed a WM recall task in which the item most likely to be tested was cued retrospectively during retention. By manipulating retro-cue reliability (i.e., the ratio of valid to invalid cue trials), we varied the incentive to retain non-cued items. Storage and selective attention in WM were measured during the retention interval by contralateral delay activity (CDA) and contralateral alpha power suppression, respectively. Soon after highly reliable cues, the cued item was attended, and non-cued items suffered information loss. However, for less reliable cues, initially the cued item was attended, but unattended items were kept in WM. Later during the delay, previously unattended items suffered information loss despite now attention being reallocated to their locations, presumably to strengthen their weakening traces. These results show that storage and attention in WM are distinct processes that can behave differently depending on the relative importance of representations.

Original languageEnglish
Article number13499
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalScientific Reports
Volume9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
Electroencephalography
Cues
Motivation

Cite this

@article{782162b7b1a547569e766fb74c71fee9,
title = "EEG dynamics reveal a dissociation between storage and selective attention within working memory",
abstract = "Selective attention plays a prominent role in prioritizing information in working memory (WM), improving performance for attended representations. However, it remains unclear whether unattended WM representations suffer from information loss. Here we tested the hypothesis that within WM, selectively attending to an item and stopping storing other items are independent mechanisms. We recorded EEG while participants performed a WM recall task in which the item most likely to be tested was cued retrospectively during retention. By manipulating retro-cue reliability (i.e., the ratio of valid to invalid cue trials), we varied the incentive to retain non-cued items. Storage and selective attention in WM were measured during the retention interval by contralateral delay activity (CDA) and contralateral alpha power suppression, respectively. Soon after highly reliable cues, the cued item was attended, and non-cued items suffered information loss. However, for less reliable cues, initially the cued item was attended, but unattended items were kept in WM. Later during the delay, previously unattended items suffered information loss despite now attention being reallocated to their locations, presumably to strengthen their weakening traces. These results show that storage and attention in WM are distinct processes that can behave differently depending on the relative importance of representations.",
author = "Eren G{\"u}nseli and Fahrenfort, {Johannes Jacobus} and {van Moorselaar}, Dirk and Daoultzis, {Konstantinos Christos} and Martijn Meeter and Olivers, {Christian N.L.}",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1038/s41598-019-49577-0",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "1--13",
journal = "Scientific Reports",
issn = "2045-2322",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

}

EEG dynamics reveal a dissociation between storage and selective attention within working memory. / Günseli, Eren; Fahrenfort, Johannes Jacobus; van Moorselaar, Dirk; Daoultzis, Konstantinos Christos; Meeter, Martijn; Olivers, Christian N.L.

In: Scientific Reports, Vol. 9, 13499, 18.09.2019, p. 1-13.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - EEG dynamics reveal a dissociation between storage and selective attention within working memory

AU - Günseli, Eren

AU - Fahrenfort, Johannes Jacobus

AU - van Moorselaar, Dirk

AU - Daoultzis, Konstantinos Christos

AU - Meeter, Martijn

AU - Olivers, Christian N.L.

PY - 2019/9/18

Y1 - 2019/9/18

N2 - Selective attention plays a prominent role in prioritizing information in working memory (WM), improving performance for attended representations. However, it remains unclear whether unattended WM representations suffer from information loss. Here we tested the hypothesis that within WM, selectively attending to an item and stopping storing other items are independent mechanisms. We recorded EEG while participants performed a WM recall task in which the item most likely to be tested was cued retrospectively during retention. By manipulating retro-cue reliability (i.e., the ratio of valid to invalid cue trials), we varied the incentive to retain non-cued items. Storage and selective attention in WM were measured during the retention interval by contralateral delay activity (CDA) and contralateral alpha power suppression, respectively. Soon after highly reliable cues, the cued item was attended, and non-cued items suffered information loss. However, for less reliable cues, initially the cued item was attended, but unattended items were kept in WM. Later during the delay, previously unattended items suffered information loss despite now attention being reallocated to their locations, presumably to strengthen their weakening traces. These results show that storage and attention in WM are distinct processes that can behave differently depending on the relative importance of representations.

AB - Selective attention plays a prominent role in prioritizing information in working memory (WM), improving performance for attended representations. However, it remains unclear whether unattended WM representations suffer from information loss. Here we tested the hypothesis that within WM, selectively attending to an item and stopping storing other items are independent mechanisms. We recorded EEG while participants performed a WM recall task in which the item most likely to be tested was cued retrospectively during retention. By manipulating retro-cue reliability (i.e., the ratio of valid to invalid cue trials), we varied the incentive to retain non-cued items. Storage and selective attention in WM were measured during the retention interval by contralateral delay activity (CDA) and contralateral alpha power suppression, respectively. Soon after highly reliable cues, the cued item was attended, and non-cued items suffered information loss. However, for less reliable cues, initially the cued item was attended, but unattended items were kept in WM. Later during the delay, previously unattended items suffered information loss despite now attention being reallocated to their locations, presumably to strengthen their weakening traces. These results show that storage and attention in WM are distinct processes that can behave differently depending on the relative importance of representations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072405226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072405226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41598-019-49577-0

DO - 10.1038/s41598-019-49577-0

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 1

EP - 13

JO - Scientific Reports

JF - Scientific Reports

SN - 2045-2322

M1 - 13499

ER -