Effect of fibrin glue on the healing efficacy of deproteinized bovine bone and autologous bone in critical-sized calvarial defects in rats

Chengwei Tu, Aisha Bajwa, Andi Shi, Gang Wu, Jingxiao Wang*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

144 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives: In order to verify the hypothesis that fibrin glue (FG) is able to seal the area of bone grafting and facilitate bone regeneration. Materials and methods: Twenty-one Sprague–Dawley rats with critical-sized calvarial bone defects were randomly assigned to three groups: (A) co-administrated deproteinized bovine bone (DBB) and autologous bone grafts with FG [fibrin (+)], (B) co-administrated DBB and autologous bone grafts without FG [fibrin (−)], and (C) no graft as control. Four weeks and 8 weeks later, micro-CT analysis and histomorphometric analysis were carried out to evaluate following parameters: bone volume fraction (BV/TV), trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) and trabecular separation (Tb.Sp), percentage of new bone area (Pe.NB), average thickness of bone defect (Th.BD), average thickness of basal bone (Th.BB), and percentage of new bone in center of the skull defect (Pe.NBc). Results: BV/TV, Tb.Th, and Tb.N in fibrin (−) group were significantly higher than that of fibrin (+) group (p = 0.008, 0.000, 0.007, respectively) and control group (p = 0.004, 0.001, and 0.007, respectively) at 8 weeks. Pe.NB in fibrin (−) group (33.67 ± 11.72%) was significantly higher than that of fibrin (+) group (12.33 ± 3.21%) (p = 0.038) and control group (9.66 ± 8.50%) (p = 0.045) at 8 weeks. Pe.NBc in fibrin (−) group (12.05 ± 3.91%) was significantly higher than that of fibrin (+) group (4.79 ± 1.21%) (p = 0.005) and control group (0.00 ± 0.00%) (p = 0.000) at 4 weeks. Conclusions: Administration of both DBB and autograft stimulates calvarial bone defect regeneration, while combination of FG does not additionally accelerate new bone formation. Clinical relevance: The use of fibrin to cement traditional bone graft materials in oral clinical practice requires caution.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2491-2502
Number of pages12
JournalClinical Oral Investigations
Volume26
Issue number3
Early online date29 Jan 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The work was supported by the Foundation of Science and Technology Department Project of Zhejiang Province (2017C33168) as well as the Basic Scientific Research Projects of Wenzhou (2020Y0362, 2021Y0983), China.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Funding

The work was supported by the Foundation of Science and Technology Department Project of Zhejiang Province (2017C33168) as well as the Basic Scientific Research Projects of Wenzhou (2020Y0362, 2021Y0983), China.

Keywords

  • Bone defect
  • Bone regeneration
  • Deproteinized bovine bone
  • Fibrin glue
  • Micro-CT
  • Rats

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of fibrin glue on the healing efficacy of deproteinized bovine bone and autologous bone in critical-sized calvarial defects in rats'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this