TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of reaction layer removal methods on bond strength of pressed lithium disilicate ceramic to resin cement
AU - Bauken, Gabriel
AU - Packaeser, Maria Gabriela
AU - Pilecco, Rafaela Oliveira
AU - Machry, Renan Vaz
AU - Pereira, Gabriel Kalil Rocha
AU - Valandro, Luiz Felipe
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2025/3/26
Y1 - 2025/3/26
N2 - The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of reaction layer removal methods on the immediate and long-term bond strength of pressed lithium disilicate ceramics, with or without 5% hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching. For this, sixty lithium disilicate ceramic discs (Ø= 12 mm, thickness= 1.2 mm) were assigned to 6 groups based on removal method and surface pretreatment: CTRL (polishing only), CTRL + HF (polishing + HF etching), GB (grit-blasting), GB + HF (grit-blasting + HF), LCA (grit-blasting + 0.6% HF + 1.7% H2SO4), and LCA + HF (LCA + HF). Resin cement cylinders were built, light-cured, and tested for microshear bond strength (μSBS) after 24 h or 90 days (with 10,000 thermal cycles). Surface topography, chemical composition, and failure modes were assessed. No significant difference in bond strength was observed between groups at baseline (p> 0.05). After aging, LCA + HF and GB + HF showed the highest μSBS, with no significant difference from CTRL + HF and LCA. GB had no significant difference from CTRL + HF and LCA. CTRL had the lowest bond strength (p< 0.05). All groups showed a decrease in bond strength after aging, but HF etching minimized this decrease. Higher amounts of Mg and P were found in the reaction layer presence. Therefore, grit-blasting or low-concentration acid immersion combined with grit-blasting are effective methods for removing the reaction layer without affecting bond strength. However, HF etching is crucial for reliable long-term bond strength.
AB - The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of reaction layer removal methods on the immediate and long-term bond strength of pressed lithium disilicate ceramics, with or without 5% hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching. For this, sixty lithium disilicate ceramic discs (Ø= 12 mm, thickness= 1.2 mm) were assigned to 6 groups based on removal method and surface pretreatment: CTRL (polishing only), CTRL + HF (polishing + HF etching), GB (grit-blasting), GB + HF (grit-blasting + HF), LCA (grit-blasting + 0.6% HF + 1.7% H2SO4), and LCA + HF (LCA + HF). Resin cement cylinders were built, light-cured, and tested for microshear bond strength (μSBS) after 24 h or 90 days (with 10,000 thermal cycles). Surface topography, chemical composition, and failure modes were assessed. No significant difference in bond strength was observed between groups at baseline (p> 0.05). After aging, LCA + HF and GB + HF showed the highest μSBS, with no significant difference from CTRL + HF and LCA. GB had no significant difference from CTRL + HF and LCA. CTRL had the lowest bond strength (p< 0.05). All groups showed a decrease in bond strength after aging, but HF etching minimized this decrease. Higher amounts of Mg and P were found in the reaction layer presence. Therefore, grit-blasting or low-concentration acid immersion combined with grit-blasting are effective methods for removing the reaction layer without affecting bond strength. However, HF etching is crucial for reliable long-term bond strength.
KW - Acid-etching
KW - Ceramics
KW - Dental
KW - Grit-blasting
KW - Hydrofluoric acid
KW - Microshear bond strength
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105000666736&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105000666736&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2025.104018
DO - 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2025.104018
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105000666736
SN - 0143-7496
VL - 140
SP - 1
EP - 7
JO - International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives
JF - International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives
M1 - 104018
ER -