Effect of retirement on cognitive function: the Whitehall II cohort study

  • Baowen Xue
  • , Dorina Cadar
  • , Maria Fleischmann
  • , Stephen Stansfeld
  • , Ewan Carr
  • , Mika Kivimäki
  • , Anne McMunn
  • , Jenny Head

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

According to the ‘use it or lose it’ hypothesis, a lack of mentally challenging activities might exacerbate the loss of cognitive function. On this basis, retirement has been suggested to increase the risk of cognitive decline, but evidence from studies with long follow-up is lacking. We tested this hypothesis in a cohort of 3433 civil servants who participated in the Whitehall II Study, including repeated measurements of cognitive functioning up to 14 years before and 14 years after retirement. Piecewise models, centred at the year of retirement, were used to compare trajectories of verbal memory, abstract reasoning, phonemic verbal fluency, and semantic verbal fluency before and after retirement. We found that all domains of cognition declined over time. Declines in verbal memory were 38% faster after retirement compared to before, after taking account of age-related decline. In analyses stratified by employment grade, higher employment grade was protective against verbal memory decline while people were still working, but this ‘protective effect’ was lost when individuals retired, resulting in a similar rate of decline post-retirement across employment grades. We did not find a significant impact of retirement on the other cognitive domains. In conclusion, these findings are consistent with the hypothesis that retirement accelerates the decline in verbal memory function. This study points to the benefits of cognitively stimulating activities associated with employment that could benefit older people’s memory.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)989-1001
Number of pages13
JournalEuropean Journal of Epidemiology
Volume33
Issue number10
Early online date26 Dec 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2018

Funding

We thank all participating civil service departments and their welfare personnel and establishment officers; the Occupational Health and Safety Agency; the Council of Civil Service Unions; all participating civil servants in the Whitehall II Study; and all members of the Whitehall II Study Team. The Whitehall II Study Team comprises research scientists, statisticians, study coordinators, nurses, data managers, administrative assistants, and data entry staff, who make the study possible. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Funding This work was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council and the Medical Research Council as part of the Lifelong Health and Well-Being (LLHW) initiative (Grant Number ES/ L002892/1). The Whitehall II study is also supported by British Medical Research Council Grant (G0902037 & K013351). The funding organisations had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. SAS was (in part) supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) North Thames at Bart’s Health NHS Trust. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

FundersFunder number
LLHW
Institution of Occupational Safety and Health
National Institute for Health Research
Council of Civil Service Unions
Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care - Greater Manchester
UK Research and Innovation
Economic and Social Research CouncilES/J023299/1, ES/L002892/1, ES/J019119/1
Medical Research CouncilMR/K013351/1, G0902037, K013351

    Keywords

    • Cognition
    • Employment grade
    • Longitudinal study
    • Piecewise regression
    • Retirement

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of retirement on cognitive function: the Whitehall II cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this