Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of self-help plus (sh+) for preventing mental disorders in refugees and asylum seekers in Europe and Turkey: Study protocols for two randomised controlled trials

Marianna Purgato*, Kenneth Carswell, Ceren Acarturk, Teresa Au, Sena Akbai, Minna Anttila, Josef Baumgartner, Della Bailey, Massimo Biondi, Martha Bird, Rachel Churchill, Sevde Eskici, Louise Juul Hansen, Paul Heron, Zeynep Ilkkursun, Reinhold Kilian, Markus Koesters, Tella Lantta, Michela Nosè, Giovanni OstuzziDavide Papola, Mariana Popa, Marit Sijbrandij, Lorenzo Tarsitani, Federico Tedeschi, Giulia Turrini, Ersin Uygun, Maritta Anneli Välimäki, Johannes Wancata, Ross White, Elisa Zanini, Pim Cuijpers, Corrado Barbui, Mark Van Ommeren

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Introduction This article describes two randomised controlled trials that will evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Self-Help Plus (SH+), a group self-help intervention developed by the WHO to reduce distress. In these trials SH+ is being tested as a preventative intervention to lower the incidence of mental disorders in asylum seekers and refugees with psychological distress resettled in Europe and Turkey. Methods and analysis Two prospective, multicentre, randomised, rater-blinded, parallel-group studies will follow participants over a period of 12 months. One trial will be conducted in Europe and one in Turkey. In each trial, 600 asylum seekers and refugees screening positive on the General Health Questionnaire (≥3), but without a formal diagnosis of any mental disorders according to the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, will be randomly allocated to SH+or to enhanced treatment-as-usual. The primary outcome will be a lower incidence of mental disorders at 6 month follow-up. Secondary outcomes will include the evaluation of psychological symptoms, functioning, well-being, treatment acceptability and indicators of intervention cost-effectiveness. Ethics and dissemination The two trials received ethical clearance from the local Ethics Committees of the participating sites (seven sites), as well as from the WHO Ethics Committee. All participants will provide informed consent before screening and before study inclusion (a two-step procedure). The results of the trials will be disseminated in agreement with a dissemination plan that includes publication(s) in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at relevant national and international conferences and meetings. Trials registration numbers NCT03571347, NCT03587896.

Original languageEnglish
Article number030259
JournalBMJ Open
Volume9
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2019

Funding

Funding This work is supported by the European Commission, grant agreement n. 779255 “RE-DEFINE: Refugee Emergency: DEFining and Implementing Novel Evidence-based psychosocial interventions”. The funder had no role in study design, and will have no role in data management, analysis, interpretation of data, writing the report and the decision to submit the report for publication nor ultimate authority over any of the listed activities. EU will have the possibility to audit the financial project management, while for the scientific part deliverables and milestones are being provided to the EU according to the grant agreement.

FundersFunder number
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
European Commission779255

    Keywords

    • Asylum seekers
    • Global mental health
    • Psychosocial interventions
    • Randomized controlled trials
    • Refugees

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of self-help plus (sh+) for preventing mental disorders in refugees and asylum seekers in Europe and Turkey: Study protocols for two randomised controlled trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this