Effectiveness of a return-to-work intervention for subacute low-back pain: a systematic review

H. Hlobil, J.B. Staal, M. Spoelstra, G.A. Ari�ns, T. Smid, W. van Mechelen

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The effectiveness of return-to-work intervention for subacute low-back pain on work absenteeism, pain severity, and functional status was examined by means of a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Publications in English that met the selection criteria were identified in a computer-aided search and assessed for methodological quality. A best-evidence synthesis was performed instead of statistical data pooling, because of the heterogeneity of the interventions and study populations. Five of nine studies comparing return-to-work intervention with usual care were identified as methodologically high-quality studies. Strong evidence was found for the effectiveness of return to work intervention on the return-to-work rate after 6 months and for the effectiveness of return-to-work intervention on the reduction of days of absence from work after > or = 12 months. It can be concluded that return-to-work interventions are equal or more effective regarding absence from work due to subacute low-back pain than usual care is
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)249-257
JournalScandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of a return-to-work intervention for subacute low-back pain: a systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this