Effectiveness of deposit-refund systems for household waste in the Netherlands: Applying a partial equilibrium model

Vincent Linderhof, Frans H. Oosterhuis, Pieter J.H. van Beukering, Heleen Bartelings

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Deposit-refund schemes (DRS) are basically a combination of two instruments: a tax on the purchase of a certain product, and a subsidy on the separate collection of the same product in its after-use stage. They can be efficient policy instruments to encourage reuse and recycling. However, empirical studies on impact of DRS systems on recycling rates are hardly done. In this paper, we applied the Fullerton-Wu model, a partial equilibrium model, to simulate the impact of introducing mandatory DRS for small electric appliances and batteries in the Netherlands. For small electric appliances, a deposit-refund rate of €5 to €15 per appliance would lead to an increase in the recycling rate (recycled appliances as a percentage of total amount of appliances disposed of) from 60.7% to 64.7% and 76.4% respectively. For batteries, a DRS would increase the recycling rate from 86.9% to between 87.2 and 89.2% depending on the deposit tax level ranging from €5 to €20 per kg and the price elasticities assumed (low and high). Obviously, the performance of DRS in terms of additional recycling is stronger in cases where current recycling rates are relatively low. Moreover, the pre-existence of an infrastructure for separate collection would make small white goods an interesting candidate for this instrument.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)842-850
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Environmental Management
Volume232
Early online date6 Dec 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

domestic waste
Deposits
recycling
Recycling
Electric appliances
Taxation
Electric batteries
elasticity
infrastructure
rate
Elasticity

Keywords

  • Batteries
  • Deposit-refund schemes
  • Effectiveness
  • Partial equilibrium model
  • Small electric appliances
  • The Netherlands

Cite this

@article{8313b794163f4f0690593a4a44c5fa64,
title = "Effectiveness of deposit-refund systems for household waste in the Netherlands: Applying a partial equilibrium model",
abstract = "Deposit-refund schemes (DRS) are basically a combination of two instruments: a tax on the purchase of a certain product, and a subsidy on the separate collection of the same product in its after-use stage. They can be efficient policy instruments to encourage reuse and recycling. However, empirical studies on impact of DRS systems on recycling rates are hardly done. In this paper, we applied the Fullerton-Wu model, a partial equilibrium model, to simulate the impact of introducing mandatory DRS for small electric appliances and batteries in the Netherlands. For small electric appliances, a deposit-refund rate of €5 to €15 per appliance would lead to an increase in the recycling rate (recycled appliances as a percentage of total amount of appliances disposed of) from 60.7{\%} to 64.7{\%} and 76.4{\%} respectively. For batteries, a DRS would increase the recycling rate from 86.9{\%} to between 87.2 and 89.2{\%} depending on the deposit tax level ranging from €5 to €20 per kg and the price elasticities assumed (low and high). Obviously, the performance of DRS in terms of additional recycling is stronger in cases where current recycling rates are relatively low. Moreover, the pre-existence of an infrastructure for separate collection would make small white goods an interesting candidate for this instrument.",
keywords = "Batteries, Deposit-refund schemes, Effectiveness, Partial equilibrium model, Small electric appliances, The Netherlands",
author = "Vincent Linderhof and Oosterhuis, {Frans H.} and {van Beukering}, {Pieter J.H.} and Heleen Bartelings",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.102",
language = "English",
volume = "232",
pages = "842--850",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Management",
issn = "0301-4797",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

Effectiveness of deposit-refund systems for household waste in the Netherlands : Applying a partial equilibrium model. / Linderhof, Vincent; Oosterhuis, Frans H.; van Beukering, Pieter J.H.; Bartelings, Heleen.

In: Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 232, 15.02.2019, p. 842-850.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of deposit-refund systems for household waste in the Netherlands

T2 - Applying a partial equilibrium model

AU - Linderhof, Vincent

AU - Oosterhuis, Frans H.

AU - van Beukering, Pieter J.H.

AU - Bartelings, Heleen

PY - 2019/2/15

Y1 - 2019/2/15

N2 - Deposit-refund schemes (DRS) are basically a combination of two instruments: a tax on the purchase of a certain product, and a subsidy on the separate collection of the same product in its after-use stage. They can be efficient policy instruments to encourage reuse and recycling. However, empirical studies on impact of DRS systems on recycling rates are hardly done. In this paper, we applied the Fullerton-Wu model, a partial equilibrium model, to simulate the impact of introducing mandatory DRS for small electric appliances and batteries in the Netherlands. For small electric appliances, a deposit-refund rate of €5 to €15 per appliance would lead to an increase in the recycling rate (recycled appliances as a percentage of total amount of appliances disposed of) from 60.7% to 64.7% and 76.4% respectively. For batteries, a DRS would increase the recycling rate from 86.9% to between 87.2 and 89.2% depending on the deposit tax level ranging from €5 to €20 per kg and the price elasticities assumed (low and high). Obviously, the performance of DRS in terms of additional recycling is stronger in cases where current recycling rates are relatively low. Moreover, the pre-existence of an infrastructure for separate collection would make small white goods an interesting candidate for this instrument.

AB - Deposit-refund schemes (DRS) are basically a combination of two instruments: a tax on the purchase of a certain product, and a subsidy on the separate collection of the same product in its after-use stage. They can be efficient policy instruments to encourage reuse and recycling. However, empirical studies on impact of DRS systems on recycling rates are hardly done. In this paper, we applied the Fullerton-Wu model, a partial equilibrium model, to simulate the impact of introducing mandatory DRS for small electric appliances and batteries in the Netherlands. For small electric appliances, a deposit-refund rate of €5 to €15 per appliance would lead to an increase in the recycling rate (recycled appliances as a percentage of total amount of appliances disposed of) from 60.7% to 64.7% and 76.4% respectively. For batteries, a DRS would increase the recycling rate from 86.9% to between 87.2 and 89.2% depending on the deposit tax level ranging from €5 to €20 per kg and the price elasticities assumed (low and high). Obviously, the performance of DRS in terms of additional recycling is stronger in cases where current recycling rates are relatively low. Moreover, the pre-existence of an infrastructure for separate collection would make small white goods an interesting candidate for this instrument.

KW - Batteries

KW - Deposit-refund schemes

KW - Effectiveness

KW - Partial equilibrium model

KW - Small electric appliances

KW - The Netherlands

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059316267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059316267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.102

DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.102

M3 - Article

VL - 232

SP - 842

EP - 850

JO - Journal of Environmental Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Management

SN - 0301-4797

ER -