Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effectiveness of exercise therapy for osteoarthritis: an overview of systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials

  • Tim Schleimer
  • , Florian Teichert
  • , Marius Henriksen
  • , Rebekka Doeding
  • , Tiziano Innocenti
  • , Helena Brisby
  • , Matthias C Klotz
  • , Marianne Korinth
  • , Patrick J Owen
  • , Dawid Pieper
  • , Daniel L Belavy

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of the effects of exercise for osteoarthritis.

DESIGN: Overview.

DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Epistemonikos, PEDro, Cochrane and registries from inception to 8 November 2025.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Reviews comparing exercise with placebo, no intervention or other interventions on pain and function for osteoarthritis. Supplementary trials were included to update inconclusive areas.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed bias. Data were standardised to a 0-100 scale and reanalysed using random-effects meta-analysis. Certainty was rated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation.

RESULTS: Five reviews (κ=100; n=8631) and 28 supplementary trials (knee/hip κ=23, hand κ=3, ankle κ=2; n=4360) were included. Evidence indicated small, short-term effects of exercise versus placebo (mean difference -10.8, 95% CI -19.1 to -2.6) and no-treatment (-12.4, 95% CI -15.6 to -9.2) for knee osteoarthritis pain, but certainty was very low and effects in larger or longer-term trials were smaller. Moderate evidence suggested negligible effects in hip (-6.7 95% CI -9.3 to -4.0) and small effects in hand (-10.0 95% CI -15.5 to -4.5) osteoarthritis. Varying certainty evidence indicated comparable outcomes to education, manual therapy, analgesics, injections and arthroscopy. Single trials in selected populations showed exercise was less effective than knee osteotomy (12.4 95% CI 4.7 to 20.2) and joint replacement (knee 17.1 95% CI 10.4 to 23.8; hip 24.2 95% CI 18.2 to 30.2) at longer term.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Evidence on exercise for osteoarthritis remains largely inconclusive, suggesting negligible or short-lasting small effects comparable to, or less effective than, other treatments. These findings question its universal promotion and highlight the need to revisit research priorities and clinical discussions around its worthwhileness.

REGISTRATION: CRD42023446888.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere006275
JournalRMD Open
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Feb 2026

Bibliographical note

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.

Funding

The authors would like to thank Dr. Carolien Teirlinck (PhD student; Department General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands) for providing feedback to the protocol and sharingtheir dataset.

Funders
Erasmus Universitair Medisch Centrum Rotterdam

    Keywords

    • Humans
    • Exercise Therapy/methods
    • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
    • Osteoarthritis/therapy
    • Treatment Outcome
    • Systematic Reviews as Topic
    • Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of exercise therapy for osteoarthritis: an overview of systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this