Effectiveness of physical activity interventions on reducing perceived fatigue among adults with chronic conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Ioulia Barakou, Kandianos Emmanouil Sakalidis, Abonie Ulric Sena, Tracy Finch, Katie Hackett, Florentina Hettinga

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Fatigue is barrier of physical activity participation in adults with chronic conditions. However, physical activity alleviates fatigue symptoms. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to (1) synthesise evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) exploring the effects of physical activity interventions on fatigue reduction and (2) evaluate their effectiveness. Medline/CINAHL/EMBASE/Web of Science and Scopus were searched up to June 24th, 2023. Two reviewers independently conducted study screening and selection (RCTs), extracted data and assessed risk of bias (RoB2). Outcome was the standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals in fatigue between experimental and control groups. 38 articles met the inclusion criteria. Overall, physical activity interventions moderately reduced fatigue (SMD = 0.54, p 
Original languageEnglish
Article number14582
JournalScientific Reports
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Sept 2023

Funding

This review was supported by the UK Research and Innovation, and Economic and Social research Council funded NINE Doctoral Training Partnership (grant number: ES/P000762/1). The PhD project of IB is funded by Economic and Social research Council funded NINE Doctoral Training Partnership (grant number: ES/P000762/1). UK Research and Innovation funded the publication of this review.

FundersFunder number
NINEES/P000762/1
UK Research and Innovation
Economic and Social Research Council

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of physical activity interventions on reducing perceived fatigue among adults with chronic conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this