Abstract
Background: Nowadays, personalized medical devices are frequently used for patients. Due to the manufacturing procedure sterilization is required. How different sterilization methods affect the mechanical behavior of these devices is largely unknown. Materials and methods: Three poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) based materials (Vertex Self-Curing, Palacos R+G, and NextDent C&B MFH) were sterilized with different sterilization methods: ethylene oxide, hydrogen peroxide gas plasma, autoclavation, and γ-irradiation. Mechanical properties were determined by testing the flexural strength, flexural modulus, fracture toughness, and impact strength. Results: The flexural strength of all materials was significantly higher after γ-irradiation compared to the control and other sterilization methods, as tested in a wet environment. NextDent C&B MFH showed the highest flexural and impact strength, Palacos R+G showed the highest maximum stress intensity factor and total fracture work. Conclusion: Autoclave sterilization is not suitable for the sterilization of PMMA-based materials. Ethylene oxide, hydrogen peroxide gas plasma, and γ-irradiation appear to be suitable techniques to sterilize PMMA-based personalized medical devices.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 168-172 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials |
Volume | 81 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 May 2018 |
Funding
This research is supported by the Dutch Technology Foundation STW (Project Nr. 14326; CranioSafe), which is part of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), and which is partly funded by the Ministry of Economic Affairs. This research is supported by the Dutch Technology Foundation STW (Project Nr. 14326; CranioSafe), which is part of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), and which is partly funded by the Ministry of Economic Affairs. We acknowledge the help of Jerzy Hul and his expertise in this field. This research is supported by the Dutch Technology Foundation STW (Project Nr. 14326 ; CranioSafe), which is part of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), and which is partly funded by the Ministry of Economic Affairs . We acknowledge the help of Jerzy Hul and his expertise in this field.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Ministerie van Economische Zaken | |
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek | |
Stichting voor de Technische Wetenschappen | 14326 |
Ministry of Economic Affairs |