Effects of unit-based pricing on household waste collection demand: A meta-regression analysis

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Reducing the quantity of waste is an objective pursued by an increasing number of governments. Pricing waste has been one of the most important tools used for that purpose, and the literature on the demand for household waste disposal shows a wide diversity of price elasticity calculations. We explore this issue by means of a meta-analysis on a database of 25 studies. This allows us analyzing which is the effect on the results of different data, model specification and (statistical) methods. We find no evidence that either treating prices as exogenous or including curbside recycling effects in the model influence price elasticity. There are some indications that price elasticities in the USA are more elastic, and that municipal data provide higher estimates than household data. We find that much of the variation in elasticities is associated with substantial methods; in particular it can be explained by the use of a weight-based system and by the pricing of compostable waste. In contrast, the bag-based system does not present a significant relation with elasticity. Finally, our results do not find evidence of publication bias, while they do indicate some evidence of the existence of a true empirical effect.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)169-182
JournalResource and Energy Economics
Volume44
Issue numberMay
Early online date19 Mar 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Pricing
Meta-regression analysis
Household waste
Price elasticity
Elasticity
Model specification
Publication bias
Data base
Statistical methods
Waste disposal
Government
Household
Meta-analysis

Cite this

@article{479b9e89427d474297182875bb32c328,
title = "Effects of unit-based pricing on household waste collection demand: A meta-regression analysis",
abstract = "Reducing the quantity of waste is an objective pursued by an increasing number of governments. Pricing waste has been one of the most important tools used for that purpose, and the literature on the demand for household waste disposal shows a wide diversity of price elasticity calculations. We explore this issue by means of a meta-analysis on a database of 25 studies. This allows us analyzing which is the effect on the results of different data, model specification and (statistical) methods. We find no evidence that either treating prices as exogenous or including curbside recycling effects in the model influence price elasticity. There are some indications that price elasticities in the USA are more elastic, and that municipal data provide higher estimates than household data. We find that much of the variation in elasticities is associated with substantial methods; in particular it can be explained by the use of a weight-based system and by the pricing of compostable waste. In contrast, the bag-based system does not present a significant relation with elasticity. Finally, our results do not find evidence of publication bias, while they do indicate some evidence of the existence of a true empirical effect.",
author = "G. Bel and R.H.J.M. Gradus",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.reseneeco.2016.03.003",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "169--182",
journal = "Resource and Energy Economics",
issn = "0928-7655",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "May",

}

Effects of unit-based pricing on household waste collection demand: A meta-regression analysis. / Bel, G.; Gradus, R.H.J.M.

In: Resource and Energy Economics, Vol. 44, No. May, 2016, p. 169-182.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of unit-based pricing on household waste collection demand: A meta-regression analysis

AU - Bel, G.

AU - Gradus, R.H.J.M.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Reducing the quantity of waste is an objective pursued by an increasing number of governments. Pricing waste has been one of the most important tools used for that purpose, and the literature on the demand for household waste disposal shows a wide diversity of price elasticity calculations. We explore this issue by means of a meta-analysis on a database of 25 studies. This allows us analyzing which is the effect on the results of different data, model specification and (statistical) methods. We find no evidence that either treating prices as exogenous or including curbside recycling effects in the model influence price elasticity. There are some indications that price elasticities in the USA are more elastic, and that municipal data provide higher estimates than household data. We find that much of the variation in elasticities is associated with substantial methods; in particular it can be explained by the use of a weight-based system and by the pricing of compostable waste. In contrast, the bag-based system does not present a significant relation with elasticity. Finally, our results do not find evidence of publication bias, while they do indicate some evidence of the existence of a true empirical effect.

AB - Reducing the quantity of waste is an objective pursued by an increasing number of governments. Pricing waste has been one of the most important tools used for that purpose, and the literature on the demand for household waste disposal shows a wide diversity of price elasticity calculations. We explore this issue by means of a meta-analysis on a database of 25 studies. This allows us analyzing which is the effect on the results of different data, model specification and (statistical) methods. We find no evidence that either treating prices as exogenous or including curbside recycling effects in the model influence price elasticity. There are some indications that price elasticities in the USA are more elastic, and that municipal data provide higher estimates than household data. We find that much of the variation in elasticities is associated with substantial methods; in particular it can be explained by the use of a weight-based system and by the pricing of compostable waste. In contrast, the bag-based system does not present a significant relation with elasticity. Finally, our results do not find evidence of publication bias, while they do indicate some evidence of the existence of a true empirical effect.

U2 - 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2016.03.003

DO - 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2016.03.003

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 169

EP - 182

JO - Resource and Energy Economics

JF - Resource and Energy Economics

SN - 0928-7655

IS - May

ER -