Embedding meaningful patient involvement in the process of proposal appraisal at the Dutch Cancer Society

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Although academic interest for patient involvement in health research decision-making is growing, in practice it proves challenging to involve patients meaningfully and sustainably. This article aims to unravel systemic factors influencing the embedding of meaningful patients' involvement in proposal appraisal at a private cancer research funding organization. In the case study, the emergent and participatory research approach Reflexive Monitoring in Action was applied. At first, a positive stance of stakeholders towards patient involvement was accompanied by a lack of tools and structures. This lack of tools led to the execution of various interventions. Analysis reveals that structural interventions succeeded in the bureaucratic context. The required cultural shift was also addressed, but took longer to materialize. This may have reduced the meaningful involvement of patients in proposal appraisal in practice. To overcome the underlying systemic barriers, an approach is needed that encourages stakeholders' reflexivity in the structural, cultural, and practical domain.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)254-263
Number of pages10
JournalScience and Public Policy
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

cancer
stakeholder
lack
reflexivity
research approach
decision making
funding
monitoring
organization
Society
appraisal
health
analysis

Keywords

  • Grant appraisal process
  • Patient involvement
  • System innovation

Cite this

@article{5bbb66a9d5ae4704b8e2e698f58e51ce,
title = "Embedding meaningful patient involvement in the process of proposal appraisal at the Dutch Cancer Society",
abstract = "Although academic interest for patient involvement in health research decision-making is growing, in practice it proves challenging to involve patients meaningfully and sustainably. This article aims to unravel systemic factors influencing the embedding of meaningful patients' involvement in proposal appraisal at a private cancer research funding organization. In the case study, the emergent and participatory research approach Reflexive Monitoring in Action was applied. At first, a positive stance of stakeholders towards patient involvement was accompanied by a lack of tools and structures. This lack of tools led to the execution of various interventions. Analysis reveals that structural interventions succeeded in the bureaucratic context. The required cultural shift was also addressed, but took longer to materialize. This may have reduced the meaningful involvement of patients in proposal appraisal in practice. To overcome the underlying systemic barriers, an approach is needed that encourages stakeholders' reflexivity in the structural, cultural, and practical domain.",
keywords = "Grant appraisal process, Patient involvement, System innovation",
author = "Sch{\"o}lvinck, {Anne Floor M.} and Schuitmaker, {Tjerk Jan} and Broerse, {Jacqueline E.W.}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/scipol/scy055",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "254--263",
journal = "Science & Public Policy",
issn = "0302-3427",
publisher = "Beech Tree Publishing",
number = "2",

}

Embedding meaningful patient involvement in the process of proposal appraisal at the Dutch Cancer Society. / Schölvinck, Anne Floor M.; Schuitmaker, Tjerk Jan; Broerse, Jacqueline E.W.

In: Science and Public Policy, Vol. 46, No. 2, 01.04.2019, p. 254-263.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Embedding meaningful patient involvement in the process of proposal appraisal at the Dutch Cancer Society

AU - Schölvinck, Anne Floor M.

AU - Schuitmaker, Tjerk Jan

AU - Broerse, Jacqueline E.W.

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Although academic interest for patient involvement in health research decision-making is growing, in practice it proves challenging to involve patients meaningfully and sustainably. This article aims to unravel systemic factors influencing the embedding of meaningful patients' involvement in proposal appraisal at a private cancer research funding organization. In the case study, the emergent and participatory research approach Reflexive Monitoring in Action was applied. At first, a positive stance of stakeholders towards patient involvement was accompanied by a lack of tools and structures. This lack of tools led to the execution of various interventions. Analysis reveals that structural interventions succeeded in the bureaucratic context. The required cultural shift was also addressed, but took longer to materialize. This may have reduced the meaningful involvement of patients in proposal appraisal in practice. To overcome the underlying systemic barriers, an approach is needed that encourages stakeholders' reflexivity in the structural, cultural, and practical domain.

AB - Although academic interest for patient involvement in health research decision-making is growing, in practice it proves challenging to involve patients meaningfully and sustainably. This article aims to unravel systemic factors influencing the embedding of meaningful patients' involvement in proposal appraisal at a private cancer research funding organization. In the case study, the emergent and participatory research approach Reflexive Monitoring in Action was applied. At first, a positive stance of stakeholders towards patient involvement was accompanied by a lack of tools and structures. This lack of tools led to the execution of various interventions. Analysis reveals that structural interventions succeeded in the bureaucratic context. The required cultural shift was also addressed, but took longer to materialize. This may have reduced the meaningful involvement of patients in proposal appraisal in practice. To overcome the underlying systemic barriers, an approach is needed that encourages stakeholders' reflexivity in the structural, cultural, and practical domain.

KW - Grant appraisal process

KW - Patient involvement

KW - System innovation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065721695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065721695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/scipol/scy055

DO - 10.1093/scipol/scy055

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 254

EP - 263

JO - Science & Public Policy

JF - Science & Public Policy

SN - 0302-3427

IS - 2

ER -