TY - JOUR
T1 - Emotional memory expression is misleading
T2 - delineating transitions between memory processes
AU - Faliagkas, Leonidas
AU - Rao-Ruiz, Priyanka
AU - Kindt, Merel
PY - 2018/2
Y1 - 2018/2
N2 - The hypothesis that fear memory is not necessarily permanent but can change when retrieved opens avenues to develop revolutionary treatments for emotional memory disorders. Memory reconsolidation is however only one of several mnemonic processes that may be triggered by memory reactivation and subtle environmental differences may cause a transition from a malleable to a stable state. This poses a major challenge to translating the reconsolidation intervention to clinical practice. Here we review recent advances in understanding the transitions between memory processes in animals and humans, and discuss how the cognitive expression (i.e. threat expectancies) of fear memory in humans may serve as read-out to delineate the underlying processes necessary for memory reconsolidation, independent from the emotional expression of fear memory.
AB - The hypothesis that fear memory is not necessarily permanent but can change when retrieved opens avenues to develop revolutionary treatments for emotional memory disorders. Memory reconsolidation is however only one of several mnemonic processes that may be triggered by memory reactivation and subtle environmental differences may cause a transition from a malleable to a stable state. This poses a major challenge to translating the reconsolidation intervention to clinical practice. Here we review recent advances in understanding the transitions between memory processes in animals and humans, and discuss how the cognitive expression (i.e. threat expectancies) of fear memory in humans may serve as read-out to delineate the underlying processes necessary for memory reconsolidation, independent from the emotional expression of fear memory.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040324829&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040324829&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.12.018
DO - 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.12.018
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85040324829
SN - 2352-1546
VL - 19
SP - 116
EP - 122
JO - Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
JF - Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
ER -