Employment protection, technology choice, and worker allocation

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We show empirically that high-risk sectors, which contribute strongly to aggregate productivity growth, are relatively small and have relatively low productivity growth in countries with strict employment protection legislation (EPL). To understand these findings, we develop a two-sector matching model where firms endogenously choose between a safe technology and a risky technology. For firms that have chosen the risky technology, EPL raises the costs of shedding workers in case they receive a low productivity draw. According to our calibrated model, high-EPL countries benefit less from the arrival of new risky technologies than low-EPL countries. Parameters estimated through reduced-form regressions of employment and productivity on exit costs, riskiness, and in particular their interaction are qualitatively similar for actual cross-country data and simulated model data. Our model is consistent with the slowdown in productivity in the European Union relative to the United States since the mid-1990s.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)787-826
JournalInternational Economic Review
Volume57
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Employment protection
Employment protection legislation
Technology choice
Workers
Productivity
Costs
Productivity growth
Interaction
Exit
Aggregate productivity
Matching model
Reduced form
European Union
Riskiness

Cite this

@article{f2eac4eeb33b415c9a34a61d784d6a7c,
title = "Employment protection, technology choice, and worker allocation",
abstract = "We show empirically that high-risk sectors, which contribute strongly to aggregate productivity growth, are relatively small and have relatively low productivity growth in countries with strict employment protection legislation (EPL). To understand these findings, we develop a two-sector matching model where firms endogenously choose between a safe technology and a risky technology. For firms that have chosen the risky technology, EPL raises the costs of shedding workers in case they receive a low productivity draw. According to our calibrated model, high-EPL countries benefit less from the arrival of new risky technologies than low-EPL countries. Parameters estimated through reduced-form regressions of employment and productivity on exit costs, riskiness, and in particular their interaction are qualitatively similar for actual cross-country data and simulated model data. Our model is consistent with the slowdown in productivity in the European Union relative to the United States since the mid-1990s.",
author = "E.J. Bartelsman and P.A. Gautier and {de Wind}, J.",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1111/iere.12176",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "787--826",
journal = "International Economic Review",
issn = "0020-6598",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Employment protection, technology choice, and worker allocation. / Bartelsman, E.J.; Gautier, P.A.; de Wind, J.

In: International Economic Review, Vol. 57, No. 3, 2016, p. 787-826.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Employment protection, technology choice, and worker allocation

AU - Bartelsman, E.J.

AU - Gautier, P.A.

AU - de Wind, J.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - We show empirically that high-risk sectors, which contribute strongly to aggregate productivity growth, are relatively small and have relatively low productivity growth in countries with strict employment protection legislation (EPL). To understand these findings, we develop a two-sector matching model where firms endogenously choose between a safe technology and a risky technology. For firms that have chosen the risky technology, EPL raises the costs of shedding workers in case they receive a low productivity draw. According to our calibrated model, high-EPL countries benefit less from the arrival of new risky technologies than low-EPL countries. Parameters estimated through reduced-form regressions of employment and productivity on exit costs, riskiness, and in particular their interaction are qualitatively similar for actual cross-country data and simulated model data. Our model is consistent with the slowdown in productivity in the European Union relative to the United States since the mid-1990s.

AB - We show empirically that high-risk sectors, which contribute strongly to aggregate productivity growth, are relatively small and have relatively low productivity growth in countries with strict employment protection legislation (EPL). To understand these findings, we develop a two-sector matching model where firms endogenously choose between a safe technology and a risky technology. For firms that have chosen the risky technology, EPL raises the costs of shedding workers in case they receive a low productivity draw. According to our calibrated model, high-EPL countries benefit less from the arrival of new risky technologies than low-EPL countries. Parameters estimated through reduced-form regressions of employment and productivity on exit costs, riskiness, and in particular their interaction are qualitatively similar for actual cross-country data and simulated model data. Our model is consistent with the slowdown in productivity in the European Union relative to the United States since the mid-1990s.

U2 - 10.1111/iere.12176

DO - 10.1111/iere.12176

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 787

EP - 826

JO - International Economic Review

JF - International Economic Review

SN - 0020-6598

IS - 3

ER -