Empowering citizens or mining resources? The contested domain of citizen engagement in professional care services

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

When studying individual attempts to foster citizen engagement, scholars have pointed to the coexistence of competing rationales. Thus far, however, current literature barely elaborates on the socio-political processes through which employees of professional organizations deal with such disparate considerations. To address this gap, this article builds on an ethnographic study, conducted in the Netherlands between 2013 and 2016, of a professional care organization's attempts to engage local citizens in one of its elderly care homes. To investigate how citizen engagement is ‘done’ in the context of daily organizing, we followed employees as they gradually created and demarcated the scope for such engagement by approaching citizens as either strategic partners (pursuing ‘democratic’ rationales) or as operational volunteers (pursuing ‘instrumental’ rationales). In order to deal with such potentially incongruent orientations, we found that employees used discursive strategies to influence the balance that was struck between competing rationales; either through depoliticization—i.e., the downplaying of incongruities and the framing of disparate considerations as being complementary within the pursuit of a shared, overarching goal—or through politicization, i.e., the active challenging of how their colleagues prioritized one consideration over another. By showing how the successful conveyance of such (de)politicized accounts helped employees either defend or redraw the boundaries of what citizen engagement was (not) about, we contribute to extant theorization by (1) developing a processual approach to studying citizen engagement that (2) is sensitive to organizational politics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume203
Issue numberApril
Early online date7 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2018

Fingerprint

citizen
Politics
Home Care Services
employee
resources
Netherlands
Volunteers
politicization
professional association
coexistence
home care
Resources
politics
Employees

Keywords

  • Citizen engagement
  • Healthcare organizations
  • Management
  • Organizational boundaries
  • Participation
  • Public involvement
  • The Netherlands
  • Volunteering

Cite this

@article{041c738e8e834586a1a000dfea0210db,
title = "Empowering citizens or mining resources? The contested domain of citizen engagement in professional care services",
abstract = "When studying individual attempts to foster citizen engagement, scholars have pointed to the coexistence of competing rationales. Thus far, however, current literature barely elaborates on the socio-political processes through which employees of professional organizations deal with such disparate considerations. To address this gap, this article builds on an ethnographic study, conducted in the Netherlands between 2013 and 2016, of a professional care organization's attempts to engage local citizens in one of its elderly care homes. To investigate how citizen engagement is ‘done’ in the context of daily organizing, we followed employees as they gradually created and demarcated the scope for such engagement by approaching citizens as either strategic partners (pursuing ‘democratic’ rationales) or as operational volunteers (pursuing ‘instrumental’ rationales). In order to deal with such potentially incongruent orientations, we found that employees used discursive strategies to influence the balance that was struck between competing rationales; either through depoliticization—i.e., the downplaying of incongruities and the framing of disparate considerations as being complementary within the pursuit of a shared, overarching goal—or through politicization, i.e., the active challenging of how their colleagues prioritized one consideration over another. By showing how the successful conveyance of such (de)politicized accounts helped employees either defend or redraw the boundaries of what citizen engagement was (not) about, we contribute to extant theorization by (1) developing a processual approach to studying citizen engagement that (2) is sensitive to organizational politics.",
keywords = "Citizen engagement, Healthcare organizations, Management, Organizational boundaries, Participation, Public involvement, The Netherlands, Volunteering",
author = "Ludo Glimmerveen and Sierk Ybema and Henk Nies",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.03.013",
language = "English",
volume = "203",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "April",

}

Empowering citizens or mining resources? The contested domain of citizen engagement in professional care services. / Glimmerveen, Ludo; Ybema, Sierk; Nies, Henk.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 203, No. April, 04.2018, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Empowering citizens or mining resources? The contested domain of citizen engagement in professional care services

AU - Glimmerveen, Ludo

AU - Ybema, Sierk

AU - Nies, Henk

PY - 2018/4

Y1 - 2018/4

N2 - When studying individual attempts to foster citizen engagement, scholars have pointed to the coexistence of competing rationales. Thus far, however, current literature barely elaborates on the socio-political processes through which employees of professional organizations deal with such disparate considerations. To address this gap, this article builds on an ethnographic study, conducted in the Netherlands between 2013 and 2016, of a professional care organization's attempts to engage local citizens in one of its elderly care homes. To investigate how citizen engagement is ‘done’ in the context of daily organizing, we followed employees as they gradually created and demarcated the scope for such engagement by approaching citizens as either strategic partners (pursuing ‘democratic’ rationales) or as operational volunteers (pursuing ‘instrumental’ rationales). In order to deal with such potentially incongruent orientations, we found that employees used discursive strategies to influence the balance that was struck between competing rationales; either through depoliticization—i.e., the downplaying of incongruities and the framing of disparate considerations as being complementary within the pursuit of a shared, overarching goal—or through politicization, i.e., the active challenging of how their colleagues prioritized one consideration over another. By showing how the successful conveyance of such (de)politicized accounts helped employees either defend or redraw the boundaries of what citizen engagement was (not) about, we contribute to extant theorization by (1) developing a processual approach to studying citizen engagement that (2) is sensitive to organizational politics.

AB - When studying individual attempts to foster citizen engagement, scholars have pointed to the coexistence of competing rationales. Thus far, however, current literature barely elaborates on the socio-political processes through which employees of professional organizations deal with such disparate considerations. To address this gap, this article builds on an ethnographic study, conducted in the Netherlands between 2013 and 2016, of a professional care organization's attempts to engage local citizens in one of its elderly care homes. To investigate how citizen engagement is ‘done’ in the context of daily organizing, we followed employees as they gradually created and demarcated the scope for such engagement by approaching citizens as either strategic partners (pursuing ‘democratic’ rationales) or as operational volunteers (pursuing ‘instrumental’ rationales). In order to deal with such potentially incongruent orientations, we found that employees used discursive strategies to influence the balance that was struck between competing rationales; either through depoliticization—i.e., the downplaying of incongruities and the framing of disparate considerations as being complementary within the pursuit of a shared, overarching goal—or through politicization, i.e., the active challenging of how their colleagues prioritized one consideration over another. By showing how the successful conveyance of such (de)politicized accounts helped employees either defend or redraw the boundaries of what citizen engagement was (not) about, we contribute to extant theorization by (1) developing a processual approach to studying citizen engagement that (2) is sensitive to organizational politics.

KW - Citizen engagement

KW - Healthcare organizations

KW - Management

KW - Organizational boundaries

KW - Participation

KW - Public involvement

KW - The Netherlands

KW - Volunteering

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043364499&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043364499&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.03.013

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.03.013

M3 - Article

VL - 203

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

IS - April

ER -