TY - JOUR
T1 - Erratum to: Multivariate EEG analyses support high-resolution tracking of feature-based attentional selection
AU - Fahrenfort, Johannes Jacobus
AU - Grubert, Anna
AU - Olivers, Christian N.L.
AU - Eimer, Martin
N1 - Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01911-0, published online 15 May 2017.
PY - 2018/7/20
Y1 - 2018/7/20
N2 - This Article contains an error in the legend of Figure 6. “Decoding accuracy in Experiment 2. (A) 8-way classification accuracy of target position (chance = 0.125). The black line reflects significance at p < 10−3 (cluster based permutation test), shaded area is +/− s.e.m. Peak at 264 ms. Note again the similarity in temporal evolution with the N2pc (Fig. 3) and decoding accuracies of Experiment 1 (Fig. 4), although plausibly peaking slightly later because of the increase in the number of items on the screen. (B) Classsification accuracy per quadrant (chance = 0.5). (C) Separate N2pc components were computed for left versus right target objects at each of the four vertical elevations, indicated by color. Colored sections indicate p < 10−3 (cluster based permutation test).” should read: “Comparing the N2pc to decoding accuracy in Experiment 2. (A) Average N2pc for left and right targets in Experiment 2, computed using PO7 and PO8 (see Methods). Peak at 260 ms. (B) 8-way classification accuracy of target position in Experiment 2 (chance = 0.125). Peak at 264 ms. Note again the similarity in temporal evolution of decoding accuracy in panel B when compared to the temporal evolution of the N2pc in panel A. (C) Separate N2pc components at each of the four vertical elevations, indicated by color. Thick black or colored lines reflect significance at p < 10−3 (cluster based permutation test), shaded areas are +/− s.e.m.”.
AB - This Article contains an error in the legend of Figure 6. “Decoding accuracy in Experiment 2. (A) 8-way classification accuracy of target position (chance = 0.125). The black line reflects significance at p < 10−3 (cluster based permutation test), shaded area is +/− s.e.m. Peak at 264 ms. Note again the similarity in temporal evolution with the N2pc (Fig. 3) and decoding accuracies of Experiment 1 (Fig. 4), although plausibly peaking slightly later because of the increase in the number of items on the screen. (B) Classsification accuracy per quadrant (chance = 0.5). (C) Separate N2pc components were computed for left versus right target objects at each of the four vertical elevations, indicated by color. Colored sections indicate p < 10−3 (cluster based permutation test).” should read: “Comparing the N2pc to decoding accuracy in Experiment 2. (A) Average N2pc for left and right targets in Experiment 2, computed using PO7 and PO8 (see Methods). Peak at 260 ms. (B) 8-way classification accuracy of target position in Experiment 2 (chance = 0.125). Peak at 264 ms. Note again the similarity in temporal evolution of decoding accuracy in panel B when compared to the temporal evolution of the N2pc in panel A. (C) Separate N2pc components at each of the four vertical elevations, indicated by color. Thick black or colored lines reflect significance at p < 10−3 (cluster based permutation test), shaded areas are +/− s.e.m.”.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050520859&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050520859&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41598-018-29326-5
DO - 10.1038/s41598-018-29326-5
M3 - Comment / Letter to the editor
AN - SCOPUS:85050520859
SN - 2045-2322
VL - 8
SP - 1
EP - 1
JO - Scientific Reports
JF - Scientific Reports
M1 - 11236
ER -