Error management in audit firms: Error climate, type, and originator

A.H. Gold, U. Gronewold, S.E. Salterio

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper examines how the treatment of audit staff who discover errors in audit files by superiors affects their willingness to report these errors. The way staff are treated by superiors is labelled as the audit office error management climate. In a "blame-oriented" climate errors are not tolerated and those committing errors are punished. In contrast, an "open" climate characterizes error commitment as a normal, albeit unfortunate aspect of organizational life that offers opportunities for learning without sanctions on the originator. We examine error management climate in the context of audit-specific factors that might affect the decision to report errors: audit error type (conceptual or mechanical) and who committed the error (the individual who discovered it or a peer). An open climate results in an increase in the reporting of mechanical (but not conceptual) errors and all peer errors versus a blame climate. Post hoc findings suggest that one obstacle to reporting conceptual errors stems from an auditor's own impression management concerns. We discuss how auditing standards and regulatory inspections may impact audit firm error management climates.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)303-330
JournalThe Accounting Review
Volume89
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Climate
Audit firms
Audit
Peers
Staff
Specific factors
Auditing standards
Willingness
Impression management
Inspection
Sanctions
Auditors

Cite this

Gold, A.H. ; Gronewold, U. ; Salterio, S.E. / Error management in audit firms: Error climate, type, and originator. In: The Accounting Review. 2014 ; Vol. 89, No. 1. pp. 303-330.
@article{848ce4e5d05c418c92c9ae68acc1b8fe,
title = "Error management in audit firms: Error climate, type, and originator",
abstract = "This paper examines how the treatment of audit staff who discover errors in audit files by superiors affects their willingness to report these errors. The way staff are treated by superiors is labelled as the audit office error management climate. In a {"}blame-oriented{"} climate errors are not tolerated and those committing errors are punished. In contrast, an {"}open{"} climate characterizes error commitment as a normal, albeit unfortunate aspect of organizational life that offers opportunities for learning without sanctions on the originator. We examine error management climate in the context of audit-specific factors that might affect the decision to report errors: audit error type (conceptual or mechanical) and who committed the error (the individual who discovered it or a peer). An open climate results in an increase in the reporting of mechanical (but not conceptual) errors and all peer errors versus a blame climate. Post hoc findings suggest that one obstacle to reporting conceptual errors stems from an auditor's own impression management concerns. We discuss how auditing standards and regulatory inspections may impact audit firm error management climates.",
author = "A.H. Gold and U. Gronewold and S.E. Salterio",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.2308/accr-50592",
language = "English",
volume = "89",
pages = "303--330",
journal = "The Accounting Review",
issn = "0001-4826",
publisher = "American Accounting Association",
number = "1",

}

Error management in audit firms: Error climate, type, and originator. / Gold, A.H.; Gronewold, U.; Salterio, S.E.

In: The Accounting Review, Vol. 89, No. 1, 2014, p. 303-330.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Error management in audit firms: Error climate, type, and originator

AU - Gold, A.H.

AU - Gronewold, U.

AU - Salterio, S.E.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This paper examines how the treatment of audit staff who discover errors in audit files by superiors affects their willingness to report these errors. The way staff are treated by superiors is labelled as the audit office error management climate. In a "blame-oriented" climate errors are not tolerated and those committing errors are punished. In contrast, an "open" climate characterizes error commitment as a normal, albeit unfortunate aspect of organizational life that offers opportunities for learning without sanctions on the originator. We examine error management climate in the context of audit-specific factors that might affect the decision to report errors: audit error type (conceptual or mechanical) and who committed the error (the individual who discovered it or a peer). An open climate results in an increase in the reporting of mechanical (but not conceptual) errors and all peer errors versus a blame climate. Post hoc findings suggest that one obstacle to reporting conceptual errors stems from an auditor's own impression management concerns. We discuss how auditing standards and regulatory inspections may impact audit firm error management climates.

AB - This paper examines how the treatment of audit staff who discover errors in audit files by superiors affects their willingness to report these errors. The way staff are treated by superiors is labelled as the audit office error management climate. In a "blame-oriented" climate errors are not tolerated and those committing errors are punished. In contrast, an "open" climate characterizes error commitment as a normal, albeit unfortunate aspect of organizational life that offers opportunities for learning without sanctions on the originator. We examine error management climate in the context of audit-specific factors that might affect the decision to report errors: audit error type (conceptual or mechanical) and who committed the error (the individual who discovered it or a peer). An open climate results in an increase in the reporting of mechanical (but not conceptual) errors and all peer errors versus a blame climate. Post hoc findings suggest that one obstacle to reporting conceptual errors stems from an auditor's own impression management concerns. We discuss how auditing standards and regulatory inspections may impact audit firm error management climates.

U2 - 10.2308/accr-50592

DO - 10.2308/accr-50592

M3 - Article

VL - 89

SP - 303

EP - 330

JO - The Accounting Review

JF - The Accounting Review

SN - 0001-4826

IS - 1

ER -