TY - JOUR
T1 - Europe Needs a New Vision for a Natura 2020 Network
AU - Hochkirch, Axel
AU - Schmitt, Thomas
AU - Beninde, Joscha
AU - Hiery, Marietta
AU - Kinitz, Tim
AU - Kirschey, Jenny
AU - Matenaar, Daniela
AU - Rohde, Katja
AU - Stoefen, Aleke
AU - Wagner, Norman
AU - Zink, Andreas
AU - Lötters, Stefan
AU - Veith, Michael
AU - Proelss, Alexander
PY - 2013/11
Y1 - 2013/11
N2 - Twenty years after the world's nations agreed upon the Convention on Biodiversity, there is still a global decline in biodiversity. At present it seems unlikely that the Aichi Targets of halting biodiversity loss by 2020 will be met. Although the European Union is often seen as a pioneer in this regard, as its "Habitats Directive" represents one of the strongest legal tools in nature conservation, biodiversity continues to decline even in Europe. We outline four major problems in the current implementation of the directive. First, prioritization needs to be based upon comprehensive scientific knowledge. This requires a maximized number of red list assessments of European species and a regular adaptation of the annexes in order to focus on those sites with the highest conservation value. Second, strategic conservation plans need to be compiled for highly threatened species and adaptive management plans need to be implemented in each reserve. Third, an improved "on-ground" monitoring system is necessary, focusing on population trends of priority species and feeding back to management plans and red list assessments. Fourth, substantial financial resources have to be invested in the implementation as well as education in order to reach a societal consensus on the necessity for conservation.©2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
AB - Twenty years after the world's nations agreed upon the Convention on Biodiversity, there is still a global decline in biodiversity. At present it seems unlikely that the Aichi Targets of halting biodiversity loss by 2020 will be met. Although the European Union is often seen as a pioneer in this regard, as its "Habitats Directive" represents one of the strongest legal tools in nature conservation, biodiversity continues to decline even in Europe. We outline four major problems in the current implementation of the directive. First, prioritization needs to be based upon comprehensive scientific knowledge. This requires a maximized number of red list assessments of European species and a regular adaptation of the annexes in order to focus on those sites with the highest conservation value. Second, strategic conservation plans need to be compiled for highly threatened species and adaptive management plans need to be implemented in each reserve. Third, an improved "on-ground" monitoring system is necessary, focusing on population trends of priority species and feeding back to management plans and red list assessments. Fourth, substantial financial resources have to be invested in the implementation as well as education in order to reach a societal consensus on the necessity for conservation.©2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888882533&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/conl.12006
DO - 10.1111/conl.12006
M3 - Article
SN - 1755-263X
VL - 6
SP - 462
EP - 467
JO - Conservation Letters
JF - Conservation Letters
IS - 6
ER -