European anthropogenic AFOLU greenhouse gas emissions: a review and benchmark data

Ana Maria Roxana Petrescu*, Glen G. Peters, Greet Janssens-Maenhout, Philippe Ciais, Francesco F. Tubiello, Giacomo Grassi, Gert Jan Nabuurs, Adrian Leip, Gema Carmona-Garcia, Wilfried Winiwarter, Lena Höglund-Isaksson, Dirk Günther, Efisio Solazzo, Anja Kiesow, Ana Bastos, Julia Pongratz, Julia E.M.S. Nabel, Giulia Conchedda, Roberto Pilli, Robbie R. AndrewMart Jan Schelhaas, Albertus A. Dolman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review


Emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and removals from land, including both anthropogenic and natural fluxes, require reliable quantification, including estimates of uncertainties, to support credible mitigation action under the Paris Agreement. This study provides a state-of-the-art scientific overview of bottom-up anthropogenic emissions data from agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) in the European Union (EU28<span classCombining double low line"note-anchor" idCombining double low line"fna_Ch1.Footn1"><a hrefCombining double low line"#fn_Ch1.Footn1">1</a></span>). The data integrate recent AFOLU emission inventories with ecosystem data and land carbon models and summarize GHG emissions and removals over the period 1990-2016. This compilation of bottom-up estimates of the AFOLU GHG emissions of European national greenhouse gas inventories (NGHGIs), with those of land carbon models and observation-based estimates of large-scale GHG fluxes, aims at improving the overall estimates of the GHG balance in Europe with respect to land GHG emissions and removals. Whenever available, we present uncertainties, its propagation and role in the comparison of different estimates. While NGHGI data for the EU28 provide consistent quantification of uncertainty following the established IPCC Guidelines, uncertainty in the estimates produced with other methods needs to account for both within model uncertainty and the spread from different model results. The largest inconsistencies between EU28 estimates are mainly due to different sources of data related to human activity, referred to here as activity data (AD) and methodologies (tiers) used for calculating emissions and removals from AFOLU sectors. The referenced datasets related to figures are visualized at <a hrefCombining double low line""></a> (Petrescu et al., 2020).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)961-1001
Number of pages41
JournalEarth System Science Data
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2020


Dive into the research topics of 'European anthropogenic AFOLU greenhouse gas emissions: a review and benchmark data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this