Evaluating of research in context - an approach and two cases

S de Jong, P. van Arensbergen, F. Daemen, B. van der Meulen, P.A.A. van den Besselaar

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Science is increasingly heterogeneous, posing new questions for research evaluation. How can we evaluate the between scientific and societal quality of research, taking into account differences between research fields and between research groups? In this paper we present the findings of two case studies in fields where societal and scholarly output of research are highly intertwined (architecture and law). We analyze the nature of the two fields in terms of research areas and specific aspects of knowledge dynamics. This results in an approach and indicators for contextual research evaluation. © Beech Tree Publishing 2011.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)61-72
Number of pages12
JournalResearch Evaluation
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

evaluation research
field research
Law
science
Group

Cite this

de Jong, S ; van Arensbergen, P. ; Daemen, F. ; van der Meulen, B. ; van den Besselaar, P.A.A. / Evaluating of research in context - an approach and two cases. In: Research Evaluation. 2011 ; Vol. 20, No. 1. pp. 61-72.
@article{05ed683cf05541878abe4811b331fde2,
title = "Evaluating of research in context - an approach and two cases",
abstract = "Science is increasingly heterogeneous, posing new questions for research evaluation. How can we evaluate the between scientific and societal quality of research, taking into account differences between research fields and between research groups? In this paper we present the findings of two case studies in fields where societal and scholarly output of research are highly intertwined (architecture and law). We analyze the nature of the two fields in terms of research areas and specific aspects of knowledge dynamics. This results in an approach and indicators for contextual research evaluation. {\circledC} Beech Tree Publishing 2011.",
author = "{de Jong}, S and {van Arensbergen}, P. and F. Daemen and {van der Meulen}, B. and {van den Besselaar}, P.A.A.",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.3152/095820211X12941371876346",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "61--72",
journal = "Research Evaluation",
issn = "0958-2029",
publisher = "Beech Tree Publishing",
number = "1",

}

Evaluating of research in context - an approach and two cases. / de Jong, S; van Arensbergen, P.; Daemen, F.; van der Meulen, B.; van den Besselaar, P.A.A.

In: Research Evaluation, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2011, p. 61-72.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating of research in context - an approach and two cases

AU - de Jong, S

AU - van Arensbergen, P.

AU - Daemen, F.

AU - van der Meulen, B.

AU - van den Besselaar, P.A.A.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Science is increasingly heterogeneous, posing new questions for research evaluation. How can we evaluate the between scientific and societal quality of research, taking into account differences between research fields and between research groups? In this paper we present the findings of two case studies in fields where societal and scholarly output of research are highly intertwined (architecture and law). We analyze the nature of the two fields in terms of research areas and specific aspects of knowledge dynamics. This results in an approach and indicators for contextual research evaluation. © Beech Tree Publishing 2011.

AB - Science is increasingly heterogeneous, posing new questions for research evaluation. How can we evaluate the between scientific and societal quality of research, taking into account differences between research fields and between research groups? In this paper we present the findings of two case studies in fields where societal and scholarly output of research are highly intertwined (architecture and law). We analyze the nature of the two fields in terms of research areas and specific aspects of knowledge dynamics. This results in an approach and indicators for contextual research evaluation. © Beech Tree Publishing 2011.

U2 - 10.3152/095820211X12941371876346

DO - 10.3152/095820211X12941371876346

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 61

EP - 72

JO - Research Evaluation

JF - Research Evaluation

SN - 0958-2029

IS - 1

ER -