Evaluating research portfolios

Peter van den Besselaar, Ulf Sandström

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review


Evaluating whether a portfolio of funded research projects (of a research council), or a portfolio of research papers (the output of a university) is relevant for science and for society requires two-dimensional mapping of the project portfolio: (i) projecting the portfolio on a science map showing how the portfolio fits into and possibly shapes the research fronts, and (ii) projecting the portfolio on a map of societal challenges, showing where the portfolio links to societal challenges or innovation. This requires evaluating the portfolio in two different ‘languages’: a technical language relating projects to the research front, and a societal language relating the projects to societal challenges. In this paper, we demonstrate a method for doing so. The advantage is that the method is much less dependent on subjective classifications by single experts or a small group of experts, and that it is rather user-friendly.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEu-SPRI 2019 - Science, technology and innovation policies for sustainable development goals, Roma, 5-7 June
Subtitle of host publicationBook of Abstracts
Number of pages12
Publication statusPublished - 2019


Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating research portfolios'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this