Evaluation of a plot-scale methane emission model using eddy covariance observations and footprint modelling

A. Budishchev, Y. Mi, J. van Huissteden, L. Belelli-Marchesini, G. Schaepman-Strub, F.J.W. Parmentier, M. Fratini, A. Gallagher, T.C. Maximov, A.J. Dolman

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Most plot-scale methane emission models - of which many have been developed in the recent past - are validated using data collected with the closed-chamber technique. This method, however, suffers from a low spatial representativeness and a poor temporal resolution. Also, during a chamber-flux measurement the air within a chamber is separated from the ambient atmosphere, which negates the influence of wind on emissions. Additionally, some methane models are validated by upscaling fluxes based on the area-weighted averages of modelled fluxes, and by comparing those to the eddy covariance (EC) flux. This technique is rather inaccurate, as the area of upscaling might be different from the EC tower footprint, therefore introducing significant mismatch. In this study, we present an approach to validate plot-scale methane models with EC observations using the footprint-weighted average method. Our results show that the fluxes obtained by the footprint-weighted average method are of the same magnitude as the EC flux. More importantly, the temporal dynamics of the EC flux on a daily timescale are also captured (r
Original languageEnglish
Article number17
Pages (from-to)4651-4664
JournalBiogeosciences
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

eddy covariance
footprint
methane
upscaling
modeling
methodology
flux measurement
evaluation
timescale
air
atmosphere
method

Cite this

Budishchev, A. ; Mi, Y. ; van Huissteden, J. ; Belelli-Marchesini, L. ; Schaepman-Strub, G. ; Parmentier, F.J.W. ; Fratini, M. ; Gallagher, A. ; Maximov, T.C. ; Dolman, A.J. / Evaluation of a plot-scale methane emission model using eddy covariance observations and footprint modelling. In: Biogeosciences. 2014 ; No. 11. pp. 4651-4664.
@article{5941cd6dc6d743b085a6d16c3694285e,
title = "Evaluation of a plot-scale methane emission model using eddy covariance observations and footprint modelling",
abstract = "Most plot-scale methane emission models - of which many have been developed in the recent past - are validated using data collected with the closed-chamber technique. This method, however, suffers from a low spatial representativeness and a poor temporal resolution. Also, during a chamber-flux measurement the air within a chamber is separated from the ambient atmosphere, which negates the influence of wind on emissions. Additionally, some methane models are validated by upscaling fluxes based on the area-weighted averages of modelled fluxes, and by comparing those to the eddy covariance (EC) flux. This technique is rather inaccurate, as the area of upscaling might be different from the EC tower footprint, therefore introducing significant mismatch. In this study, we present an approach to validate plot-scale methane models with EC observations using the footprint-weighted average method. Our results show that the fluxes obtained by the footprint-weighted average method are of the same magnitude as the EC flux. More importantly, the temporal dynamics of the EC flux on a daily timescale are also captured (r",
author = "A. Budishchev and Y. Mi and {van Huissteden}, J. and L. Belelli-Marchesini and G. Schaepman-Strub and F.J.W. Parmentier and M. Fratini and A. Gallagher and T.C. Maximov and A.J. Dolman",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.5194/bg-11-4651-2014",
language = "English",
pages = "4651--4664",
journal = "Biogeosciences",
issn = "1726-4170",
publisher = "European Geosciences Union",
number = "11",

}

Budishchev, A, Mi, Y, van Huissteden, J, Belelli-Marchesini, L, Schaepman-Strub, G, Parmentier, FJW, Fratini, M, Gallagher, A, Maximov, TC & Dolman, AJ 2014, 'Evaluation of a plot-scale methane emission model using eddy covariance observations and footprint modelling' Biogeosciences, no. 11, 17, pp. 4651-4664. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-4651-2014

Evaluation of a plot-scale methane emission model using eddy covariance observations and footprint modelling. / Budishchev, A.; Mi, Y.; van Huissteden, J.; Belelli-Marchesini, L.; Schaepman-Strub, G.; Parmentier, F.J.W.; Fratini, M.; Gallagher, A.; Maximov, T.C.; Dolman, A.J.

In: Biogeosciences, No. 11, 17, 2014, p. 4651-4664.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of a plot-scale methane emission model using eddy covariance observations and footprint modelling

AU - Budishchev, A.

AU - Mi, Y.

AU - van Huissteden, J.

AU - Belelli-Marchesini, L.

AU - Schaepman-Strub, G.

AU - Parmentier, F.J.W.

AU - Fratini, M.

AU - Gallagher, A.

AU - Maximov, T.C.

AU - Dolman, A.J.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Most plot-scale methane emission models - of which many have been developed in the recent past - are validated using data collected with the closed-chamber technique. This method, however, suffers from a low spatial representativeness and a poor temporal resolution. Also, during a chamber-flux measurement the air within a chamber is separated from the ambient atmosphere, which negates the influence of wind on emissions. Additionally, some methane models are validated by upscaling fluxes based on the area-weighted averages of modelled fluxes, and by comparing those to the eddy covariance (EC) flux. This technique is rather inaccurate, as the area of upscaling might be different from the EC tower footprint, therefore introducing significant mismatch. In this study, we present an approach to validate plot-scale methane models with EC observations using the footprint-weighted average method. Our results show that the fluxes obtained by the footprint-weighted average method are of the same magnitude as the EC flux. More importantly, the temporal dynamics of the EC flux on a daily timescale are also captured (r

AB - Most plot-scale methane emission models - of which many have been developed in the recent past - are validated using data collected with the closed-chamber technique. This method, however, suffers from a low spatial representativeness and a poor temporal resolution. Also, during a chamber-flux measurement the air within a chamber is separated from the ambient atmosphere, which negates the influence of wind on emissions. Additionally, some methane models are validated by upscaling fluxes based on the area-weighted averages of modelled fluxes, and by comparing those to the eddy covariance (EC) flux. This technique is rather inaccurate, as the area of upscaling might be different from the EC tower footprint, therefore introducing significant mismatch. In this study, we present an approach to validate plot-scale methane models with EC observations using the footprint-weighted average method. Our results show that the fluxes obtained by the footprint-weighted average method are of the same magnitude as the EC flux. More importantly, the temporal dynamics of the EC flux on a daily timescale are also captured (r

U2 - 10.5194/bg-11-4651-2014

DO - 10.5194/bg-11-4651-2014

M3 - Article

SP - 4651

EP - 4664

JO - Biogeosciences

JF - Biogeosciences

SN - 1726-4170

IS - 11

M1 - 17

ER -