Evaluation of an informational web site: Three variants of the think-aloud method compared

Maaike J. Van Den Haak; Menno D. T. De Jong; Peter Jan Schellens

Evaluation of an informational web site: Three variants of the think-aloud method compared

Maaike J. Van Den Haak^*, Menno D. T. De Jong, Peter Jan Schellens

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Questions the assumption that usability methods are equally suitable for evaluating Web sites and Web applications Concludes that the decision to choose one variant of the think-aloud method over another should be based on practical considerations.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	58-71
Number of pages	14
Journal	TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION
Volume	54
Issue number	1
Publication status	Published - Feb 2007

Keywords

Usability
Think aloud
Concurrent think aloud protocols
Retrospective think aloud protocols
Constructive interaction

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{1037161bea9249898ec20b6dbcf222ed,

title = "Evaluation of an informational web site: Three variants of the think-aloud method compared",

abstract = "Questions the assumption that usability methods are equally suitable for evaluating Web sites and Web applications Concludes that the decision to choose one variant of the think-aloud method over another should be based on practical considerations.",

keywords = "Usability, Think aloud, Concurrent think aloud protocols, Retrospective think aloud protocols, Constructive interaction",

author = "{Van Den Haak}, {Maaike J.} and {De Jong}, {Menno D. T.} and Schellens, {Peter Jan}",

year = "2007",

month = feb,

language = "English",

volume = "54",

pages = "58--71",

journal = "TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION",

issn = "0049-3155",

publisher = "Society For Technical Communication",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of an informational web site

T2 - Three variants of the think-aloud method compared

AU - Van Den Haak, Maaike J.

AU - De Jong, Menno D. T.

AU - Schellens, Peter Jan

PY - 2007/2

Y1 - 2007/2

N2 - Questions the assumption that usability methods are equally suitable for evaluating Web sites and Web applications Concludes that the decision to choose one variant of the think-aloud method over another should be based on practical considerations.

AB - Questions the assumption that usability methods are equally suitable for evaluating Web sites and Web applications Concludes that the decision to choose one variant of the think-aloud method over another should be based on practical considerations.

KW - Usability

KW - Think aloud

KW - Concurrent think aloud protocols

KW - Retrospective think aloud protocols

KW - Constructive interaction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947249033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33947249033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33947249033

VL - 54

SP - 58

EP - 71

JO - TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION

JF - TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION

SN - 0049-3155

IS - 1

ER -

Evaluation of an informational web site: Three variants of the think-aloud method compared

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Handle.net

Other files and links

Fingerprint

A penny for your thoughts: Investigating the validity and reliability of think-aloud protocols for usability testing.

Cite this