Evaluation of an informational web site: Three variants of the think-aloud method compared

Maaike J. Van Den Haak*, Menno D. T. De Jong, Peter Jan Schellens

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Questions the assumption that usability methods are equally suitable for evaluating Web sites and Web applications Concludes that the decision to choose one variant of the think-aloud method over another should be based on practical considerations.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)58-71
    Number of pages14
    JournalTECHNICAL COMMUNICATION
    Volume54
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2007

    Keywords

    • Usability
    • Think aloud
    • Concurrent think aloud protocols
    • Retrospective think aloud protocols
    • Constructive interaction

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of an informational web site: Three variants of the think-aloud method compared'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Research Output

    • 33 Citations
    • 1 PhD Thesis - Research external, graduation external

    A penny for your thoughts: Investigating the validity and reliability of think-aloud protocols for usability testing.

    van den Haak, M., 19 Jun 2008

    Research output: PhD ThesisPhD Thesis - Research external, graduation external

    Cite this