Evaluation of measurement properties of self-administered PROMs aimed at patients with non-specific shoulder pain and "activity limitations": a systematic review

M. Thoomes-de Graaf, G G M Scholten-Peeters, J.M. Schellingerhout, A.M. Bourne, R. Buchbinder, R.B.M. Koehorst, C.B. Terwee, Arianne P Verhagen

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To critically appraise and compare the measurement properties of self-administered patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) focussing on the shoulder, assessing "activity limitations."

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. The study population had to consist of patients with shoulder pain. We excluded postoperative patients or patients with generic diseases. The methodological quality of the selected studies and the results of the measurement properties were critically appraised and rated using the COSMIN checklist.

RESULTS: Out of a total of 3427 unique hits, 31 articles, evaluating 7 different questionnaires, were included. The SPADI is the most frequently evaluated PROM and its measurement properties seem adequate apart from a lack of information regarding its measurement error and content validity.

CONCLUSION: For English, Norwegian and Turkish users, we recommend to use the SPADI. Dutch users could use either the SDQ or the SST. In German, we recommend the DASH. In Tamil, Slovene, Spanish and the Danish languages, the evaluated PROMs were not yet of acceptable validity. None of these PROMs showed strong positive evidence for all measurement properties. We propose to develop a new shoulder PROM focused on activity limitations, taking new knowledge and techniques into account.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2141
Pages (from-to)2141-2160
Number of pages20
JournalQuality of Life Research
Volume25
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2016

Fingerprint

Shoulder Pain
Checklist
Language
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Population

Keywords

  • Journal Article
  • Review

Cite this

Thoomes-de Graaf, M. ; Scholten-Peeters, G G M ; Schellingerhout, J.M. ; Bourne, A.M. ; Buchbinder, R. ; Koehorst, R.B.M. ; Terwee, C.B. ; Verhagen, Arianne P. / Evaluation of measurement properties of self-administered PROMs aimed at patients with non-specific shoulder pain and "activity limitations" : a systematic review. In: Quality of Life Research. 2016 ; Vol. 25, No. 9. pp. 2141-2160.
@article{3be4a2c061584db8bee67fe4f15e9a36,
title = "Evaluation of measurement properties of self-administered PROMs aimed at patients with non-specific shoulder pain and {"}activity limitations{"}: a systematic review",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To critically appraise and compare the measurement properties of self-administered patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) focussing on the shoulder, assessing {"}activity limitations.{"}STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. The study population had to consist of patients with shoulder pain. We excluded postoperative patients or patients with generic diseases. The methodological quality of the selected studies and the results of the measurement properties were critically appraised and rated using the COSMIN checklist.RESULTS: Out of a total of 3427 unique hits, 31 articles, evaluating 7 different questionnaires, were included. The SPADI is the most frequently evaluated PROM and its measurement properties seem adequate apart from a lack of information regarding its measurement error and content validity.CONCLUSION: For English, Norwegian and Turkish users, we recommend to use the SPADI. Dutch users could use either the SDQ or the SST. In German, we recommend the DASH. In Tamil, Slovene, Spanish and the Danish languages, the evaluated PROMs were not yet of acceptable validity. None of these PROMs showed strong positive evidence for all measurement properties. We propose to develop a new shoulder PROM focused on activity limitations, taking new knowledge and techniques into account.",
keywords = "Journal Article, Review",
author = "{Thoomes-de Graaf}, M. and Scholten-Peeters, {G G M} and J.M. Schellingerhout and A.M. Bourne and R. Buchbinder and R.B.M. Koehorst and C.B. Terwee and Verhagen, {Arianne P}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s11136-016-1277-7",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "2141--2160",
journal = "Quality of Life Research",
issn = "0962-9343",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "9",

}

Evaluation of measurement properties of self-administered PROMs aimed at patients with non-specific shoulder pain and "activity limitations" : a systematic review. / Thoomes-de Graaf, M.; Scholten-Peeters, G G M; Schellingerhout, J.M.; Bourne, A.M.; Buchbinder, R.; Koehorst, R.B.M.; Terwee, C.B.; Verhagen, Arianne P.

In: Quality of Life Research, Vol. 25, No. 9, 2141, 09.2016, p. 2141-2160.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of measurement properties of self-administered PROMs aimed at patients with non-specific shoulder pain and "activity limitations"

T2 - a systematic review

AU - Thoomes-de Graaf, M.

AU - Scholten-Peeters, G G M

AU - Schellingerhout, J.M.

AU - Bourne, A.M.

AU - Buchbinder, R.

AU - Koehorst, R.B.M.

AU - Terwee, C.B.

AU - Verhagen, Arianne P

PY - 2016/9

Y1 - 2016/9

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To critically appraise and compare the measurement properties of self-administered patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) focussing on the shoulder, assessing "activity limitations."STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. The study population had to consist of patients with shoulder pain. We excluded postoperative patients or patients with generic diseases. The methodological quality of the selected studies and the results of the measurement properties were critically appraised and rated using the COSMIN checklist.RESULTS: Out of a total of 3427 unique hits, 31 articles, evaluating 7 different questionnaires, were included. The SPADI is the most frequently evaluated PROM and its measurement properties seem adequate apart from a lack of information regarding its measurement error and content validity.CONCLUSION: For English, Norwegian and Turkish users, we recommend to use the SPADI. Dutch users could use either the SDQ or the SST. In German, we recommend the DASH. In Tamil, Slovene, Spanish and the Danish languages, the evaluated PROMs were not yet of acceptable validity. None of these PROMs showed strong positive evidence for all measurement properties. We propose to develop a new shoulder PROM focused on activity limitations, taking new knowledge and techniques into account.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To critically appraise and compare the measurement properties of self-administered patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) focussing on the shoulder, assessing "activity limitations."STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. The study population had to consist of patients with shoulder pain. We excluded postoperative patients or patients with generic diseases. The methodological quality of the selected studies and the results of the measurement properties were critically appraised and rated using the COSMIN checklist.RESULTS: Out of a total of 3427 unique hits, 31 articles, evaluating 7 different questionnaires, were included. The SPADI is the most frequently evaluated PROM and its measurement properties seem adequate apart from a lack of information regarding its measurement error and content validity.CONCLUSION: For English, Norwegian and Turkish users, we recommend to use the SPADI. Dutch users could use either the SDQ or the SST. In German, we recommend the DASH. In Tamil, Slovene, Spanish and the Danish languages, the evaluated PROMs were not yet of acceptable validity. None of these PROMs showed strong positive evidence for all measurement properties. We propose to develop a new shoulder PROM focused on activity limitations, taking new knowledge and techniques into account.

KW - Journal Article

KW - Review

U2 - 10.1007/s11136-016-1277-7

DO - 10.1007/s11136-016-1277-7

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 2141

EP - 2160

JO - Quality of Life Research

JF - Quality of Life Research

SN - 0962-9343

IS - 9

M1 - 2141

ER -