TY - JOUR
T1 - Evidence on public health interventions in humanitarian crises
AU - Blanchet, Karl
AU - Ramesh, Anita
AU - Frison, Severine
AU - Warren, Emily
AU - Hossain, Mazeda
AU - Smith, James
AU - Knight, Abigail
AU - Post, Nathan
AU - Lewis, Christopher
AU - Woodward, Aniek
AU - Dahab, Maysoon
AU - Ruby, Alexander
AU - Sistenich, Vera
AU - Pantuliano, Sara
AU - Roberts, Bayard
PY - 2017/11/18
Y1 - 2017/11/18
N2 - Recognition of the need for evidence-based interventions to help to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of humanitarian responses has been increasing. However, little is known about the breadth and quality of evidence on health interventions in humanitarian crises. We describe the findings of a systematic review with the aim of examining the quantity and quality of evidence on public health interventions in humanitarian crises to identify key research gaps. We identified 345 studies published between 1980 and 2014 that met our inclusion criteria. The quantity of evidence varied substantially by health topic, from communicable diseases (n=131), nutrition (n=77), to non-communicable diseases (n=8), and water, sanitation, and hygiene (n=6). We observed common study design and weaknesses in the methods, which substantially reduced the ability to determine causation and attribution of the interventions. Considering the major increase in health-related humanitarian activities in the past three decades and calls for a stronger evidence base, this paper highlights the limited quantity and quality of health intervention research in humanitarian contexts and supports calls to scale up this research.
AB - Recognition of the need for evidence-based interventions to help to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of humanitarian responses has been increasing. However, little is known about the breadth and quality of evidence on health interventions in humanitarian crises. We describe the findings of a systematic review with the aim of examining the quantity and quality of evidence on public health interventions in humanitarian crises to identify key research gaps. We identified 345 studies published between 1980 and 2014 that met our inclusion criteria. The quantity of evidence varied substantially by health topic, from communicable diseases (n=131), nutrition (n=77), to non-communicable diseases (n=8), and water, sanitation, and hygiene (n=6). We observed common study design and weaknesses in the methods, which substantially reduced the ability to determine causation and attribution of the interventions. Considering the major increase in health-related humanitarian activities in the past three decades and calls for a stronger evidence base, this paper highlights the limited quantity and quality of health intervention research in humanitarian contexts and supports calls to scale up this research.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020459974&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30768-1
DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30768-1
M3 - Review article
SN - 0140-6736
VL - 390
SP - 2287
EP - 2296
JO - The Lancet
JF - The Lancet
IS - 10109
ER -