Abstract
This approach conceptualizes the hostile media effect (HME) as an intergroup phenomenon. Two empirical studies, one quasi-experimental and one experimental, examine the HME in the context of the abortion debate. Both studies show that ingroup identification and group status qualify the HME. Pro-choice and pro-life group members perceived an identical newspaper article as biased against their own viewpoint only if they considered their ingroup to have a lower status in society than the outgroup. In addition, only group members with a stronger ingroup identification showed a HME, particularly because of self-investment components of ingroup identification. Taken together, the findings confirm the important influence of ingroup status and ingroup identification on the HME. © 2013 International Communication Association.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 7 |
Pages (from-to) | 535-555 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Journal of Communication |
Volume | 63 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |