Excess mortality in persons with severe mental disorders: a multilevel intervention framework and priorities for clinical practice, policy and research agendas

N.H. Liu , G.L. Daumit , T. Dua , R. Aquila , F. Charlson , Pim Cuijpers, B. Druss , K. Dudek , M. Freeman , C. Fujii , W. Gaebel , U Hegerl , I. Levav , T.M. Laursen , H. Ma , M. Maj , M.E. Medina-Mora , M. Nordentoft , D. Prabhakaran , K. Pratt M. Prince , T. Rangaswamy , D. Shiers , E. Susser , G. Thornicroft , K. Wahlbeck , A.F. Wassie , H. Whitefield , S. Saxena

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Excess mortality in persons with severe mental disorders (SMD) is a major public health challenge that warrants action. The number and scope of truly tested interventions in this area remain limited, and strategies for implementation and scaling up of programmes with a strong evidence base are scarce. Furthermore, the majority of available interventions focus on a single or an otherwise limited number of risk factors. Here we present a multilevel model highlighting risk factors for excess mortality in persons with SMD at the individual, health system and socio-environmental levels. Informed by that model, we describe a comprehensive framework that may be useful for designing, implementing and evaluating interventions and programmes to reduce excess mortality in persons with SMD. This framework includes individual-focused, health system-focused, and community level and policy-focused interventions. Incorporating lessons learned from the multilevel model of risk and the comprehensive intervention framework, we identify priorities for clinical practice, policy and research agendas.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)30-40
Number of pages11
JournalWorld Psychiatry
Volume16
Issue number1
Early online date26 Jan 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Excess mortality in persons with severe mental disorders: a multilevel intervention framework and priorities for clinical practice, policy and research agendas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this