Experimental evidence on valuation with multiple priors

Jianying Qiu*, Utz Weitzel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Popular models for decision making under ambiguity assume that people use not one but multiple priors. This paper is a first attempt to experimentally elicit the min and the max of multiple priors directly. In an ambiguous scenario we measure a participant’s single prior, her min and max of multiple priors, and the valuation of an ambiguous asset with the same underlying states as the ambiguous scenario. We use the min and the max of multiple priors to directly test two popular multiple priors models: the maxmin model and the α maxmin model. We find more support for the α maxmin model: although people put about twice the weight on the minimum of multiple priors, they also consider the maximum. Furthermore, we indirectly elicit confidence weights over the whole set of multiple priors and test two additional models: variational preferences and the smooth model of ambiguity. Two particular versions of the variational preferences model explain less than the α maxmin but more than the maxmin model. Overall, the smooth model of ambiguity performs best among all models tested.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)55-74
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Risk and Uncertainty
Volume53
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Ambiguity experiment
  • Ambiguity models
  • Asset valuations
  • Multiple priors

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Experimental evidence on valuation with multiple priors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this