Expert consensus on facilitators and barriers to return-to-work following surgery for non-traumatic upper extremity conditions: A Delphi study

S. E. Peters, V. Johnston, M. Ross, M. W. Coppieters

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This Delphi study aimed to reach consensus on important facilitators and barriers for return-to-work following surgery for non-traumatic upper extremity conditions. In Round 1, experts (n = 42) listed 134 factors, which were appraised in Rounds 2 and 3. Consensus (3/485% agreement) was achieved for 13 facilitators (high motivation to return-to-work; high self-efficacy for return-to-work and recovery; availability of modified/alternative duties; flexible return-to-work arrangements; positive coping skills; limited heavy work exertion; supportive return-to-work policies; supportive supervisor/management; no catastrophic thinking; no fear avoidance to return-to-work; no fear avoidance to pain/activity; return to meaningful work duties; high job satisfaction) and six barriers (mood disorder diagnosis; pain/symptoms at more than one musculoskeletal site; heavy upper extremity exertions at work; lack of flexible return-to-work arrangements; lack of support from supervisor/management; high level of pain catastrophizing). Future prognostic studies are required to validate these biopsychosocial factors to further improve return-to-work outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-136
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)
Volume42
Issue number2
Early online date21 Sep 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2017

Fingerprint

Delphi Technique
Return to Work
Upper Extremity
Consensus
Fear
Catastrophization
Pain
Job Satisfaction
Psychological Adaptation
Self Efficacy
Mood Disorders
Motivation

Keywords

  • Hand
  • prognostic factors
  • shoulder
  • sickness absence
  • work disability
  • wrist

Cite this

@article{2c127a6893d54e1aa9757f031e396e99,
title = "Expert consensus on facilitators and barriers to return-to-work following surgery for non-traumatic upper extremity conditions: A Delphi study",
abstract = "This Delphi study aimed to reach consensus on important facilitators and barriers for return-to-work following surgery for non-traumatic upper extremity conditions. In Round 1, experts (n = 42) listed 134 factors, which were appraised in Rounds 2 and 3. Consensus (3/485{\%} agreement) was achieved for 13 facilitators (high motivation to return-to-work; high self-efficacy for return-to-work and recovery; availability of modified/alternative duties; flexible return-to-work arrangements; positive coping skills; limited heavy work exertion; supportive return-to-work policies; supportive supervisor/management; no catastrophic thinking; no fear avoidance to return-to-work; no fear avoidance to pain/activity; return to meaningful work duties; high job satisfaction) and six barriers (mood disorder diagnosis; pain/symptoms at more than one musculoskeletal site; heavy upper extremity exertions at work; lack of flexible return-to-work arrangements; lack of support from supervisor/management; high level of pain catastrophizing). Future prognostic studies are required to validate these biopsychosocial factors to further improve return-to-work outcomes.",
keywords = "Hand, prognostic factors, shoulder, sickness absence, work disability, wrist",
author = "Peters, {S. E.} and V. Johnston and M. Ross and Coppieters, {M. W.}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1753193416669263",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "127--136",
journal = "Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)",
issn = "1753-1934",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Expert consensus on facilitators and barriers to return-to-work following surgery for non-traumatic upper extremity conditions : A Delphi study. / Peters, S. E.; Johnston, V.; Ross, M.; Coppieters, M. W.

In: Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), Vol. 42, No. 2, 01.02.2017, p. 127-136.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Expert consensus on facilitators and barriers to return-to-work following surgery for non-traumatic upper extremity conditions

T2 - A Delphi study

AU - Peters, S. E.

AU - Johnston, V.

AU - Ross, M.

AU - Coppieters, M. W.

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - This Delphi study aimed to reach consensus on important facilitators and barriers for return-to-work following surgery for non-traumatic upper extremity conditions. In Round 1, experts (n = 42) listed 134 factors, which were appraised in Rounds 2 and 3. Consensus (3/485% agreement) was achieved for 13 facilitators (high motivation to return-to-work; high self-efficacy for return-to-work and recovery; availability of modified/alternative duties; flexible return-to-work arrangements; positive coping skills; limited heavy work exertion; supportive return-to-work policies; supportive supervisor/management; no catastrophic thinking; no fear avoidance to return-to-work; no fear avoidance to pain/activity; return to meaningful work duties; high job satisfaction) and six barriers (mood disorder diagnosis; pain/symptoms at more than one musculoskeletal site; heavy upper extremity exertions at work; lack of flexible return-to-work arrangements; lack of support from supervisor/management; high level of pain catastrophizing). Future prognostic studies are required to validate these biopsychosocial factors to further improve return-to-work outcomes.

AB - This Delphi study aimed to reach consensus on important facilitators and barriers for return-to-work following surgery for non-traumatic upper extremity conditions. In Round 1, experts (n = 42) listed 134 factors, which were appraised in Rounds 2 and 3. Consensus (3/485% agreement) was achieved for 13 facilitators (high motivation to return-to-work; high self-efficacy for return-to-work and recovery; availability of modified/alternative duties; flexible return-to-work arrangements; positive coping skills; limited heavy work exertion; supportive return-to-work policies; supportive supervisor/management; no catastrophic thinking; no fear avoidance to return-to-work; no fear avoidance to pain/activity; return to meaningful work duties; high job satisfaction) and six barriers (mood disorder diagnosis; pain/symptoms at more than one musculoskeletal site; heavy upper extremity exertions at work; lack of flexible return-to-work arrangements; lack of support from supervisor/management; high level of pain catastrophizing). Future prognostic studies are required to validate these biopsychosocial factors to further improve return-to-work outcomes.

KW - Hand

KW - prognostic factors

KW - shoulder

KW - sickness absence

KW - work disability

KW - wrist

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011599436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011599436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1753193416669263

DO - 10.1177/1753193416669263

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 127

EP - 136

JO - Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)

JF - Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)

SN - 1753-1934

IS - 2

ER -