TY - JOUR
T1 - Experts’ perspective on a definition for delayed return-to-work after surgery for nontraumatic upper extremity disorders
T2 - Recommendations and implications
AU - Peters, Susan E.
AU - Coppieters, Michel W.
AU - Ross, Mark
AU - Johnston, Venerina
PY - 2018/7
Y1 - 2018/7
N2 - Study Design: Descriptive study. Introduction: A delayed return to work (RTW) is often associated with poorer outcomes after a workplace injury but is ill defined. Purpose of the Study: To define delayed RTW after surgery for nontraumatic upper extremity conditions. Methods: Experts were consulted to define delayed RTW and whether a universal time point can determine the transition from early to delayed RTW. Results: Forty-two experts defined a delayed RTW as either a worker not returning to preinjury (or similar) work within the expected time frame (45%); not returning to any type of work (36%); or recovering slower than expected (12%). Two-thirds of experts believed that universal time points to delineate delayed RTW should be avoided. Discussion: Multiple factors complicate a uniform definition of delayed RTW. Conclusion: Defining delayed RTW should be individualized with due consideration to the type of work. Time-based cutoffs for outcome measurement may not be appropriate with continuous measures more appropriate in research. Level of Evidence: Decision analysis V.
AB - Study Design: Descriptive study. Introduction: A delayed return to work (RTW) is often associated with poorer outcomes after a workplace injury but is ill defined. Purpose of the Study: To define delayed RTW after surgery for nontraumatic upper extremity conditions. Methods: Experts were consulted to define delayed RTW and whether a universal time point can determine the transition from early to delayed RTW. Results: Forty-two experts defined a delayed RTW as either a worker not returning to preinjury (or similar) work within the expected time frame (45%); not returning to any type of work (36%); or recovering slower than expected (12%). Two-thirds of experts believed that universal time points to delineate delayed RTW should be avoided. Discussion: Multiple factors complicate a uniform definition of delayed RTW. Conclusion: Defining delayed RTW should be individualized with due consideration to the type of work. Time-based cutoffs for outcome measurement may not be appropriate with continuous measures more appropriate in research. Level of Evidence: Decision analysis V.
KW - Carpal tunnel syndrome
KW - Lateral epicondylalgia
KW - Outcome measurement
KW - Return to work
KW - Rotator cuff tendinopathy
KW - Work disability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015762766&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015762766&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jht.2017.02.009
DO - 10.1016/j.jht.2017.02.009
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85015762766
SN - 0894-1130
VL - 31
SP - 315
EP - 321
JO - Journal of Hand Therapy
JF - Journal of Hand Therapy
IS - 3
ER -