Explaining Institutions: A Defence of Reductionism

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Abstract New institutionalism is an approach to the study of social events that is becoming increasingly popular. Different lines of new institutional research can be distinguished. In one line of research it is argued that the social sciences should transcend reductionist modes of explanation, in particular the methodological individualism exemplified by the theory of rational choice. In this view, reductionism does not permit the endogenous treatment of institutions and thus cannot account for important aspects of the social and political context in which agents act. In this paper the meaning of the terms ‘methodological individualism’ and ‘reductionism’ is discussed and illustrated by a description of some of the central assumptions of rational choice theory, in particular game theory. It is argued that the claim that reductionism should be transcended is unwarranted: reductionism is perfectly compatible with the new institutional concerns. First of all, the various institutional dimensions that have been distinguished in the new institutional literature can be systematically described in terms of a game–theoretic model. Furthermore, the dynamic models of game theory can be (and often already have been) used to explain the emergence of institutions
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)51-69
Number of pages19
JournalEuropean Journal of Political Research
Volume32
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1997

Fingerprint

reductionism
methodological individualism
game theory
rational choice theory
institutionalism
social science
event

Cite this

@article{a7339c1cbc86457db74f91031e0c836f,
title = "Explaining Institutions: A Defence of Reductionism",
abstract = "Abstract New institutionalism is an approach to the study of social events that is becoming increasingly popular. Different lines of new institutional research can be distinguished. In one line of research it is argued that the social sciences should transcend reductionist modes of explanation, in particular the methodological individualism exemplified by the theory of rational choice. In this view, reductionism does not permit the endogenous treatment of institutions and thus cannot account for important aspects of the social and political context in which agents act. In this paper the meaning of the terms ‘methodological individualism’ and ‘reductionism’ is discussed and illustrated by a description of some of the central assumptions of rational choice theory, in particular game theory. It is argued that the claim that reductionism should be transcended is unwarranted: reductionism is perfectly compatible with the new institutional concerns. First of all, the various institutional dimensions that have been distinguished in the new institutional literature can be systematically described in terms of a game–theoretic model. Furthermore, the dynamic models of game theory can be (and often already have been) used to explain the emergence of institutions",
author = "{van Hees}, Martin",
year = "1997",
doi = "10.1111/1475-6765.00331",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "51--69",
journal = "European Journal of Political Research",
issn = "0304-4130",
publisher = "Wiley Online Library",

}

Explaining Institutions: A Defence of Reductionism. / van Hees, Martin.

In: European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 32, 1997, p. 51-69.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explaining Institutions: A Defence of Reductionism

AU - van Hees, Martin

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Abstract New institutionalism is an approach to the study of social events that is becoming increasingly popular. Different lines of new institutional research can be distinguished. In one line of research it is argued that the social sciences should transcend reductionist modes of explanation, in particular the methodological individualism exemplified by the theory of rational choice. In this view, reductionism does not permit the endogenous treatment of institutions and thus cannot account for important aspects of the social and political context in which agents act. In this paper the meaning of the terms ‘methodological individualism’ and ‘reductionism’ is discussed and illustrated by a description of some of the central assumptions of rational choice theory, in particular game theory. It is argued that the claim that reductionism should be transcended is unwarranted: reductionism is perfectly compatible with the new institutional concerns. First of all, the various institutional dimensions that have been distinguished in the new institutional literature can be systematically described in terms of a game–theoretic model. Furthermore, the dynamic models of game theory can be (and often already have been) used to explain the emergence of institutions

AB - Abstract New institutionalism is an approach to the study of social events that is becoming increasingly popular. Different lines of new institutional research can be distinguished. In one line of research it is argued that the social sciences should transcend reductionist modes of explanation, in particular the methodological individualism exemplified by the theory of rational choice. In this view, reductionism does not permit the endogenous treatment of institutions and thus cannot account for important aspects of the social and political context in which agents act. In this paper the meaning of the terms ‘methodological individualism’ and ‘reductionism’ is discussed and illustrated by a description of some of the central assumptions of rational choice theory, in particular game theory. It is argued that the claim that reductionism should be transcended is unwarranted: reductionism is perfectly compatible with the new institutional concerns. First of all, the various institutional dimensions that have been distinguished in the new institutional literature can be systematically described in terms of a game–theoretic model. Furthermore, the dynamic models of game theory can be (and often already have been) used to explain the emergence of institutions

U2 - 10.1111/1475-6765.00331

DO - 10.1111/1475-6765.00331

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 51

EP - 69

JO - European Journal of Political Research

JF - European Journal of Political Research

SN - 0304-4130

ER -