Exploiting hierarchical goals in bilateral automated negotiation: Empirical study

Philippe Pasquier, Ramon Hollands, Frank Dignum, Iyad Rahwan, Liz Sonenberg

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

While argumentation-based negotiation has been accepted as a promising alternative to game-theoretic or heuristic based negotiation, no evidence has been provided to confirm this theoretical advantage. We propose a model of bilateral negotiation extending a simple monotonic concession protocol by allowing the agents to exchange information about their underlying interests and possible alternatives to achieve them during the negotiation. We present an empirical study that demonstrates (through simulation) the advantages of this interest-based negotiation approach over the more classic monotonic concession approach to negotiation. © 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAgent-Mediated Electronic Commerce and Trading Agent Design and Analysis - AAAI 2007 Workshop, TADA 2007, Selected and Revised Papers
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Pages46-61
ISBN (Print)9783540887126
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes
Event5th Workshop on Trading Agent Design and Analysis, TADA 2007, Co-located with the 22nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2007 - , Canada
Duration: 23 Jul 200723 Jul 2007

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Business Information Processing
ISSN (Print)1865-1348

Conference

Conference5th Workshop on Trading Agent Design and Analysis, TADA 2007, Co-located with the 22nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2007
Country/TerritoryCanada
Period23/07/0723/07/07

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exploiting hierarchical goals in bilateral automated negotiation: Empirical study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this