Abstract
This paper presents a critique and extension of Weitzman's cost-effectiveness criterion for ranking biodiversity-protecting projects. Weitzman's result, which is entirely based on genetic diversity, is argued to be able to give rise to incorrect policy advice on biodiversity protection. The reason is that ecological relationships are not included. In order to do so, dependent survival probabilities are introduced. It is shown that these give rise to a different ranking of biodiversity-protecting projects. Subsequently, alternative evaluation criteria are discussed. © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 218-223 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Ecological Economics |
| Volume | 55 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2005 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Extending Weitzman's economic ranking of biodiversity protection: combining ecological and genetic considerations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver