Extension Dynamics of the Northern Fonualei Rift and Spreading Center and the Southern Mangatolu Triple Junction in the Lau Basin at 16°S

  • A. Jegen*
  • , A. Dannowski
  • , M. Schnabel
  • , U. Barckhausen
  • , P. A. Brandl
  • , M. Riedel
  • , A. Beniest
  • , I. Heyde
  • , M. D. Hannington
  • , A. Sandhu
  • , R. Werner
  • , H. Kopp
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Due to the complexity of 2D magnetic anomaly maps north of 18°S and the sparsity of seismic data, the tectonic evolution of the northern Lau Basin has not yet been unraveled. We use a multi-method approach to reconstruct the formation of the basin at ∼16°S by compiling seismic, magnetic, gravimetric and geochemical data along a 185 km-long crustal transect. We identified a crustal zonation which preserves the level of subduction input at the time of the crust's formation. Paired with the seafloor magnetization, the crustal zonation enabled us to qualitatively approximate the dynamic spreading history of the region. Further assessment of the recent tectonic activity and the degree of tectonic overprinting visible in the crust both suggest a complex tectonic history including a dynamically moving spreading center and the reorganizing of the local magma supply. Comparing the compiled data sets has revealed substantial differences in the opening mechanisms of the two arms of the Overlapping Spreading Center (OSC) that is made up by the northernmost tip of the Fonualei Rift and Spreading Center in the east and the southernmost segment of the Mangatolu Triple Junction in the west. The observed transition from a predominantly tectonic opening mechanism at the eastern OSC arm to a magmatic opening mechanism at the western OSC arm coincides with an equally sharp transition from and strongly subduction influenced crust to a crust with virtually no subduction input. The degree of subduction input alters the geochemical composition, as well as the lithospheric stress response.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2022GC010550
Pages (from-to)1-23
Number of pages23
JournalGeochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Volume24
Issue number4
Early online date19 Apr 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We are grateful to the captain and crew of RV SONNE for their support during expedition SO267 (December 2018–January 2019). We thank the technical and scientific cruise participants for their efforts. This study and the expedition SO267 were financially supported by the German Ministry of Science and Education (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), Grants 03G0267A and 03G0267B), additional support was provided by GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel and by the Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources, Hannover (BGR). Figures have been created using Generic Mapping Tool (Wessel et al., 2013 ) and QGIS. Finally, we want to thank K. Rubin, D. Eason, and A. Baxter for their insightful and thought‐provoking comments that improved the manuscript.

Funding Information:
We are grateful to the captain and crew of RV SONNE for their support during expedition SO267 (December 2018–January 2019). We thank the technical and scientific cruise participants for their efforts. This study and the expedition SO267 were financially supported by the German Ministry of Science and Education (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), Grants 03G0267A and 03G0267B), additional support was provided by GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel and by the Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources, Hannover (BGR). Figures have been created using Generic Mapping Tool (Wessel et al., 2013) and QGIS. Finally, we want to thank K. Rubin, D. Eason, and A. Baxter for their insightful and thought-provoking comments that improved the manuscript.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023. The Authors.

Funding

We are grateful to the captain and crew of RV SONNE for their support during expedition SO267 (December 2018–January 2019). We thank the technical and scientific cruise participants for their efforts. This study and the expedition SO267 were financially supported by the German Ministry of Science and Education (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), Grants 03G0267A and 03G0267B), additional support was provided by GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel and by the Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources, Hannover (BGR). Figures have been created using Generic Mapping Tool (Wessel et al., 2013 ) and QGIS. Finally, we want to thank K. Rubin, D. Eason, and A. Baxter for their insightful and thought‐provoking comments that improved the manuscript. We are grateful to the captain and crew of RV SONNE for their support during expedition SO267 (December 2018–January 2019). We thank the technical and scientific cruise participants for their efforts. This study and the expedition SO267 were financially supported by the German Ministry of Science and Education (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), Grants 03G0267A and 03G0267B), additional support was provided by GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel and by the Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources, Hannover (BGR). Figures have been created using Generic Mapping Tool (Wessel et al., 2013) and QGIS. Finally, we want to thank K. Rubin, D. Eason, and A. Baxter for their insightful and thought-provoking comments that improved the manuscript.

Keywords

  • back-arc basins
  • crustal evolution
  • extension dynamics
  • Lau Basin
  • multi-disciplinary approach
  • traveltime tomography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Extension Dynamics of the Northern Fonualei Rift and Spreading Center and the Southern Mangatolu Triple Junction in the Lau Basin at 16°S'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this