TY - JOUR
T1 - Extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics
AU - Nuthmann, Antje
AU - de Groot, Floor
AU - Huettig, Falk
AU - Olivers, Christian N.L.
PY - 2019/5
Y1 - 2019/5
N2 - There is ongoing debate on whether object meaning can be processed outside foveal vision, making semantics available for attentional guidance. Much of the debate has centred on whether objects that do not fit within an overall scene draw attention, in complex displays that are often difficult to control. Here, we revisited the question by reanalysing data from three experiments that used displays consisting of standalone objects from a carefully controlled stimulus set. Observers searched for a target object, as per auditory instruction. On the critical trials, the displays contained no target but objects that were semantically related to the target, visually related, or unrelated. Analyses using (generalized) linear mixed-effects models showed that, although visually related objects attracted most attention, semantically related objects were also fixated earlier in time than unrelated objects. Moreover, semantic matches affected the very first saccade in the display. The amplitudes of saccades that first entered semantically related objects were larger than 5° on average, confirming that object semantics is available outside foveal vision. Finally, there was no semantic capture of attention for the same objects when observers did not actively look for the target, confirming that it was not stimulus-driven. We discuss the implications for existing models of visual cognition.
AB - There is ongoing debate on whether object meaning can be processed outside foveal vision, making semantics available for attentional guidance. Much of the debate has centred on whether objects that do not fit within an overall scene draw attention, in complex displays that are often difficult to control. Here, we revisited the question by reanalysing data from three experiments that used displays consisting of standalone objects from a carefully controlled stimulus set. Observers searched for a target object, as per auditory instruction. On the critical trials, the displays contained no target but objects that were semantically related to the target, visually related, or unrelated. Analyses using (generalized) linear mixed-effects models showed that, although visually related objects attracted most attention, semantically related objects were also fixated earlier in time than unrelated objects. Moreover, semantic matches affected the very first saccade in the display. The amplitudes of saccades that first entered semantically related objects were larger than 5° on average, confirming that object semantics is available outside foveal vision. Finally, there was no semantic capture of attention for the same objects when observers did not actively look for the target, confirming that it was not stimulus-driven. We discuss the implications for existing models of visual cognition.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066821674&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066821674&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0217051
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0217051
M3 - Article
C2 - 31120948
AN - SCOPUS:85066821674
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 14
SP - e0217051
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 5
M1 - e0217051
ER -