TY - JOUR
T1 - Eye remember what happened: Eye-closure improves recall of events but not face recognition
AU - Vredeveldt, A.
AU - Tredoux, C.G.
AU - Kempen, K.
AU - Nortje, A.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Eye-closure improves event recall. We investigated whether eye-closure can also facilitate subsequent performance on lineup identification (Experiment 1) and face recognition tasks (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, participants viewed a theft, recalled the event with eyes open or closed, mentally rehearsed the perpetrator's face with eyes open or closed, and viewed a target-present or target-absent lineup. Eye-closure improved event recall, but did not significantly affect lineup identification accuracy. Experiment 2 employed a face recognition paradigm with high statistical power to permit detection of potentially small effects. Participants viewed 20 faces and were later asked to recognize the faces. Thirty seconds before the recognition task, participants either completed an unrelated distracter task (control condition), or were instructed to think about the face with their eyes open (rehearsal condition) or closed (eye-closure condition). We found no differences between conditions in discrimination accuracy or response criterion. Potential explanations and practical implications are discussed.
AB - Eye-closure improves event recall. We investigated whether eye-closure can also facilitate subsequent performance on lineup identification (Experiment 1) and face recognition tasks (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, participants viewed a theft, recalled the event with eyes open or closed, mentally rehearsed the perpetrator's face with eyes open or closed, and viewed a target-present or target-absent lineup. Eye-closure improved event recall, but did not significantly affect lineup identification accuracy. Experiment 2 employed a face recognition paradigm with high statistical power to permit detection of potentially small effects. Participants viewed 20 faces and were later asked to recognize the faces. Thirty seconds before the recognition task, participants either completed an unrelated distracter task (control condition), or were instructed to think about the face with their eyes open (rehearsal condition) or closed (eye-closure condition). We found no differences between conditions in discrimination accuracy or response criterion. Potential explanations and practical implications are discussed.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84924807607
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924807607&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/acp.3092
DO - 10.1002/acp.3092
M3 - Article
SN - 0888-4080
VL - 2015
SP - 169
EP - 180
JO - Applied Cognitive Psychology
JF - Applied Cognitive Psychology
IS - 29/2
ER -