Facilitators and barriers of implementation of routine postnatal care guidelines for women: A systematic scoping review using critical interpretive synthesis

Lenka Beňová*, Aline Semaan, Anayda Portela, Mercedes Bonet, Thomas van den Akker, Andrea B. Pembe, Allisyn Moran, Diane Duclos

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background Postnatal care (PNC) has the potential to prevent a substantial burden of maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality. This scoping review aimed to identify and synthesise themes related to facilitators and barriers of implementation of guidelines on routine PNC for women (postpartum care) in all settings. Methods This is a scoping review guided by the standard principles of Arksey & O’Malley’s framework. We used the critical interpretive synthesis method to synthesise the whole body of evidence. We searched four databases (Medline, Embase, Global Health, CINAHL Plus) using a combination of search terms comprising four key concepts: postnatal care, routine care, guidelines and implementation. No restrictions on country or language of publication were applied. We excluded studies not presenting findings about PNC for women. We thematically charted the themes of studies included based on title and abstract screening. All studies included after full text screening were described and their results synthesised using the socio-ecological model framework. We did not conduct a risk of bias analysis or quality assessment of included studies. Results We identified a total of 8692 unique records and included 43 studies which identified facilitators and barriers to implementing routine guidelines in provision of PNC to women. Three quarters of studies pertained to PNC provision in high-income countries. Specific facilitators and barriers were identified and thematically presented based on whether they affect the provision of PNC or the intersection between provision of PNC and its use by women and families. We applied a critical global health lens to synthesise three constructs in the literature: finding a balance between standardisation and individualisation of PNC, the fragmented PNC provision landscape complicating the experiences of women with intersecting vulnerabilities, and the heavy reliance on the short postpartum period as an opportunity to educate and retain women and newborns in the health system. Conclusions This interpretive synthesis of evidence shows that the fragmented and narrow nature of PNC provision presents specific challenges to developing, adapting and implementing routine PNC guidelines. This results in a lack of linkages to social support and services, fails to address intersecting vulnerabilities and inequities among women, and negatively influences care seeking. There is a lack of evidence on how processes of individualising PNC provision can be applied in practice to support health workers in providing woman-centered PNC in various global settings. Registration https://www.protocols.io/private/C99DA688881F11EBB4690A58A9FEAC02.

Original languageEnglish
Article number04176
Pages (from-to)1-17
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of global health
Volume13
Early online date24 Nov 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)

Funding

Acknowledgments: We would like to thank Dr Anteneh Asefa for assistance with retrieving full text references. Disclaimer: The named authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this publication and do not necessarily represent the decisions or the policies of the UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), or the World Health Organization (WHO). Funding: LB was funded in part by the Research Foundation – Flanders (Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek) as part of her Senior Postdoctoral Fellowship (award number 1234820N). Authorship contributions: conceptualisation: Lenka Benova; methodology: Lenka Benova, Aline Semaan, Anayda Portela, Mercedes Bonet, Thomas van den Akker, Andrea B Pembe, Allisyn Moran and Diane Duclos; data curation (screening): Lenka Benova, Aline Semaan and Diane Duclos; formal analysis: Lenka Benova, Aline Semaan and Diane Duclos; funding acquisition: Lenka Benova; visualisation: Lenka Benova, Aline Semaan and Diane Duclos; writing – original draft: Lenka Benova, Aline Semaan and Diane Duclos; writing – review and editing: Lenka Benova, Aline Se-maan, Anayda Portela, Mercedes Bonet, Thomas van den Akker, Andrea B Pembe, Allisyn Moran and Diane Duclos. Disclosure of interest: The authors completed the ICMJE Disclosure of Interest Form (available upon request from the corresponding author) and disclose no relevant interests. Additional material Online Supplementary Document 1 World Health Organization. Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2020: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and UNDESA/Population Division. Geneva; 2023. 2 UNICEF, WHO, World Bank Group, the United Nations Population Division. A Neglected Tragedy - The global burden of stillbirths. 2020. 3 Global strategy for women’s, children’s and adolescents’ health (2016-2030). Available: https://platform.who.int/data/mater-nal-newborn-child-adolescent-ageing/global-strategy-data. Accessed: 18 August 2023. 4 Sustainable development goal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. Available: https://sustain-abledevelopment.un.org/sdg3. Accessed: 22 September 2023.

FundersFunder number
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek1234820N

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Facilitators and barriers of implementation of routine postnatal care guidelines for women: A systematic scoping review using critical interpretive synthesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this